The Sons of God
According to the Bible, “The sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were beautiful; and they took wives for themselves… when the sons of God came in to the daughters of men and they bore children to them….”(Genesis 6: 2-4). In addition, ancient works such as the Book of Enoch, the Book of Jubilees and Ugaritic texts also recorded somewhat similar stories. However, no one has ever explained who exactly these Sons of God (bene haʼelohim) were. Although unknown to Anthropology, the Sons of God had to have had a genetic impact on human evolution.
Some researchers have done a wonderful job showing that the construction of the Great Pyramid utilized technology superior to what exists today, and incredible underwater discoveries speak to a lost civilization in the very distant past. However, no one has ever addressed the issue of how it was possible for mankind to have evolved on this planet so as to produce such a civilization (for further discussion you can go to my article “The Lost Civilization” which was posted 10/26/12). The implications of this missing civilization are rather staggering because it implies that man has in some respects de-evolved since that time. After all, how do you lose the knowledge that came with such technology? Further, where did the super-advanced people go and why did civilization regress?
Genetic testing is certainly in the forefront these days. A current study relates to the ancestry of people with blue eyes. Researchers now claim to have traced the blue-eyed gene back to one person in the Caucasus Mountains area near the Black Sea some 10,000 years ago. However, where did that one person get their blue eyes from? No one really seems to know.
It’s been suggested that perhaps the blue-eyed gene is a genetic defect, a mutation in effect, but there’s no explanation for how that could have happened. It’s problematic as to just how the blue-eyed gene could have spread throughout a significant portion of the world’s population. This enigma is complicated by the fact that the blue-eyed gene is recessive, which requires that both parents have a blue-eyed gene. This means that blue eyes could only have originated in a group of people that had only blue eyes.
According to current evolutionary theory, that is not even considered to be a possibility. All blue-eyed people supposedly evolved from dark-eyed people and all light-haired people (the light hair gene also being recessive) supposedly evolved from dark-haired people. We all came “out of Africa”, right? As for skull types, forget it. Despite the fact that it would have taken millions of years for a separate skull type to evolve, the human species nonetheless has three very distinct skull types. The only possible explanation for this is that either there were multiple Adam and Eves and/or that there was off-planet interference with man’s natural evolution, such as the Sons of God or genetic manipulation. Either of these scenarios could explain the recent results of genetic research into the origins of Ashkenazi Jews. That research demonstrated that 40% of the Ashkenazi population are descended from just four women; further, that those four women are not genetically related to one another nor to any current Middle Eastern ethnic group. So their civilization apparently materialized out of thin air.
DNA testing has also been done on the mummy of King Tut (who ruled Egypt circa 1300 BC ). The conclusion of the testing was that half of the men in Europe (and 70% of men in England) are direct descendants of King Tut! This demonstrates that the ancient migration of Indo-Europeans is far more complicated than ever imagined. The DNA testing also disclosed that both King Tut and Europeans have a common ancestor, the very same blue-eyed ancestor (see above) who once lived in the Caucasus almost ten thousand years ago!
Although Indo-Europeans today include a wide range of skin color, hair color and eye color, this group was originally known for a Nordic skull, blue (or green eyes) and blond (or red) hair. In America, for example, over half of the population at the turn of the 20th century still had blond hair. Excluding the Americas, Indo-Europeans geographically have ranged from the Guanches of the Canary Islands (off the west coast of Africa) to the Uyghurs of Western China, as well as the Tarim mummies of China. In between, there are the Tuareg/Berbers (of North Africa), the Aryans (of the Indus Valley civilization/modern day Pakistan) and the Persians (of Iran). Of course, Europeans, Russians, Turks and Semites generally have Indo-European ancestry as well. It should be noted that despite all of the cross-breeding over thousands of years, one can go to Iran today and see any number of blond hair and/or blue-eyed children.
Of all the recessive gene traits, including white skin color, blond hair and blue eyes, Rh negative blood may be the most interesting because it does not share an evolutionary background with the ape family. Rh blood acts as a universal donor since people with Rh negative blood can give their blood to a Rh positive person, but not the other way around. Rh negative blood is therefore pure, the blood of the gods.
With respect to biblical civilizations, the Kolbrin Bible says that the red-headed Scots have their ancient roots in Anatolia (modern-day Turkey) while some of the Egyptian pharaohs were also Indo-European as can be witnessed by the Nordic skull and light-colored hair of their mummies, and by their DNA as is the case with King Tut. Further, the Bible mentions that Esau and King David had red hair.
The Panspermia Hypothesis originated with the Greek Civilization. It holds that the seeds of life have an extraterrestrial origin. In that vein, world-famous biologist Louis Pasteur is well-known for demonstrating that life has to come from life, and not from a spontaneous generation of life from some primordial soup of molecules. Panspermia became popularized in the 19th century by physicist Lord Kelvin and in the 20th century by astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle, among others. Francis Crick, a theoretical molecular biologist who was the co-winner of the Nobel Prize for the discovery of the molecular structure of nucleic acids, took this theory to a whole new level by suggesting that Earth was intentionally seeded by an extraterrestrial race. Genetic research supports Crick’s theory in that it has identified 223 genes in our DNA that have no predecessor(s) on the genetic evolutionary tree. Scientists have reported that these genes have an extraterrestrial origin.
With respect to the out of Africa theory, there is another way, genetically speaking, for Indo-Europeans and “first man” to have had the same genetic marker. It’s really quite simple. They both could have evolved separately from a common gene pool! It is this gene pool then that is actually the real missing link in evolution, which explains all of the pervading problems with evolutionary theory. One thing is for sure. Each of these recessive traits came from an original donor(s) who had that trait and that that trait has an extraterrestrial origin, be it the Sons of God or whoever. Francis Crick was spot on when he said that humans were an extraterrestrial race.
The origins of man have been forever shrouded in mystery. Some people would like to keep it that way. That’s why they will never tell you that the three races were seeded separately and that’s why they will never tell you about extraterrestrial involvement in the creation of homo sapiens sapiens. You’ll never hear about the true origins of the white race because it’s supposedly not politically correct. You’ll never hear that in the ancient cultures of Egypt, the Middle East and the Indus Civilization a white race was in every case the ruling elite. All that they’ll ever tell you is that they mysteriously appeared in the Caucasus about 10,000 years ago. They won’t even tell you where they migrated to; that they were known as Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Germans, Vikings, the Irish and Scots, among other names in other places at other times, and they definitely won’t tell you that this group included the Lost Tribes of Israel!
The information presented above is to demonstrate that there’s always another perspective to any issue, another path to the truth. Science and religion are not absolutes, far from it. Information is power and there will always be people who seek to control it (and you).
“What luck for rulers that men do not think.”
– Adolf Hitler