DNA of the Gods

01/08/2020

The Sumerian civilization of the ancient Middle East appeared suddenly out of nowhere almost 6,000 years ago.  I say out of nowhere because that ‘s how world-renown expert in Sumerian history Samuel Kramer described it.  In any event, the Sumerian civilization had no precursor in world history and not even the vaunted Greek civilization, which followed some 3,000 years later, could compare to the Sumerian civilization.  So, where did they come from and where did they go to?  How come their advanced civilization was never passed along to future generations?

To understand the enormity of this occurrence one needs to understand that civilizations evolve in small increments over long periods of time.  In this case, man overnight took a quantum leap from being a hunter-gatherer to building great cities and using advanced technology, and then suddenly forgot how they did it and regressed back to being hunter-gatherers again.

There’s really only one way to explain such an unusual occurrence.  They came out of nowhere because they literally came from nowhere.  That is, from nowhere on this planet. Just ask former Nobel Prize winner Sir Francis Crick who came up with the ground-breaking double-helix structure of DNA and realized its implications. That is, DNA in many respects is more advanced than Man himself.

The heritage of the ancient Hebrews/Israelites can be traced all the way back to the Sumerian civilization, back to their patriarch Abraham.  Abraham’s descendants would one day reduce to writing their family history which was passed on orally for some 3,000 years.  It’s called the Old Testament (of the Bible) and the Book of Genesis has its roots in Sumeria and ancient Sumerian texts.

The ancient Hebrews were told to keep the bloodline pure, a sacred bloodline which stretched all the way back to the Sumerian kings.  That bloodline contained the legacy of the Sumerians, literally the DNA of the gods.  The Sumerians left but their DNA has been passed on from generation to generation. However, over time, the DNA of the descendants of the Sumerians has been watered down because they did not keep their bloodline pure.  As a result, these descendants literally de-evolved over the last 6,000 years.  One could only imagine what the Sumerian gods would say if they ever returned.

 

“With stunning abruptness… there appears in this little Sumerian mud garden… the whole cultural syndrome that has since constituted the germinal unit of all the high civilizations of the world.” – Joseph Campbell, The Masks of God 

The Source

01/06/2020

A few of you have asked about the “Source” of life from my last post The Third Way. Here’s what I can tell you. No one knows about the Source.  No one. It is beyond space and time.  As Michael Talbot said in his book, The Holographic Universe, our universe is the result of energies emanating from another dimension, a deeper order of existence. Therefore, from a scientific standpoint, we will never be able to observe and/or measure the Source.  All we can observe is the effect.  

There are, however, perhaps a few inferences that we can draw based on our observation of the effect:

  • There must be an uncaused first-cause (the Source), whether it be personal or impersonal.
  • The Source can never be part of the Creation.  Religious implication: As it says in the Book of John, no one has ever seen “God” (the Source).
  • The beauty and harmony in Nature is a reflection of the Source.

Further, Heaven is man’s interpretation about the Source. Life can be compared to some extent to a flashlight.  When you turn on the flashlight in a dark room, the room is illuminated by the light; thus the biblical expression, “Let there be light (life).  Death, on the other hand, is an illusion; when you turn off the flashlight the light returns to the Source (heaven).  It only ceases to exist in this dimension.

In the final analysis, it is my belief that we are all spiritual beings having a physical experience as opposed to physical beings having a spiritual experience.  We come from the Source and we return to the Source.  Beyond that, only God(?) knows for sure.

 

The universe does not exist ‘out there,’ independent of us. We are inescapably involved in bringing about that which appears to be happening. We are not only observers. We are participators.”  – John Wheeler, physicist

The Third Way

12/31/2019

The universe is composed of electro-magnetic energy which creates a bi-polar world.  That is, magnetic energy attracts and repels causing two polar opposites (e.g. light and dark, good and evil); the yin and the yang of life, so to speak. Political ideas also polarize around two opposites (e.g. capitalism vs socialism, globalism vs. populism etc.).  This duality creates conflict in the world as people are attracted to one of the two polar opposites.

For any one person, the “truth” is whichever polar opposite that they have selected.  They often even hate the other polar opposite creating even more divisiveness.  Of course, another person will select the other polar opposite as their “truth.”  The thing is, the truth can only be a combination of the two. There literally has to be what I call A Third Way. A Third Way, of course, is always rejected by people of either polar opposite. Arthur Schopenhauer understood this best.  He coined the expression about the three stages of truth which is as follows: “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” 

I’ve had any number of people ask me for clarification of The Third Way. I like to give the example of deism vs. atheism – God versus no god. Anyone who has followed my writings knows that I don’t believe in the god of religion.  However, as Louis Pasteur proved (the Law of Biogenesis), life must come from life. Life can’t just appear from nowhere and out of nothing.  No such reality exists, or as George Wald, an atheist himself, said, “When it comes to the origin of life on this earth, there are only two possibilities: creation or spontaneous generation (evolution). There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved 100 years ago….”

So, as Pasteur and Wald said, life has to be “created”.  It has to have a source, and I refer to this source as the Creator.  The Creator is not the god of any religion, but simply the source of life. This source, by definition, has to lie outside of space and time as both space and time are what Einstein referred to as “constructs.” That is, they are part of what was created. In his book, The Holographic Universe, Michael Talbot described it this way, “Our brains mathematically construct objective reality by interpreting frequencies that are ultimately projections from another dimension, a deeper order of existence that is beyond both space and time.”

The Third Way infers that life is an illusion where the truth is obscured by duality. As for the human race, we came here to experience this illusion of life, although not necessarily understand it.  As the Australian aboriginals put it, “We are all visitors to this time, this place.  We are just passing through. Our purpose here is to observe, to learn, to grow, to love…and then we return home.”

 

When I was growing up, the urban myth was that man evolved from monkeys.  However, if that was so, how come there are still monkeys?  That is, why didn’t all monkeys evolve into humans? 

However, science research into man’s origins has come a long way since then. For example, most people have Rh positive blood which shares a common gene with the rhesus monkey. In fact, man’s DNA and the DNA of the rhesus monkey are 93% similar; that’s 93% as compared to, say, the Abyssinian house cat whose genes are 90% similar to humans. Even a lowly sea urchin comes in at 70%. However some humans, although very few Asians or Africans, (and no monkeys), have Rh negative blood.  The real conundrum is that Rh negative blood has no predecessor anywhere on the planet, which is why I refer to it as the blood of the gods. 

According to a recent study by molecular biologists Alan Wilson and Rebecca Cann, who originally popularized the Out Of Africa evolutionary theory, man’s DNA can be traced back 400,000 years…to Australia and the aboriginals there. That’s Australia… and not Africa.  Problem is that Australia does not have monkeys and never has had either.  Further, DNA results from these ancient aboriginals as well as China and another location in Asia show that man mixed genetically with unknown species. Somewhat similarly, geneticists say that some of man’s DNA has an extraterrestrial origin.

So, what does this all add up to? Did life really begin in Australia? Despite all the advances in genetics research, a lot of uncertainties still exist.  There is one thing that I am certain of, though.  That is, “the powers that be” will continue to hide the truth of man’s origins from the masses.  It’s a dirty little secret that you’re not supposed to know about… but, of course, now you know (well, sort of).

 

“What has happened is that genetics has become a branch of information technology. It is pure information. It’s digital information. It’s precisely the kind of information that can be translated digit for digit, byte for byte, into any other kind of information and translated back again. This is a major revolution. I suppose it’s probably ‘the’ major revolution in the whole history of our understanding of ourselves.”  – Richard Dawkins                                               

Science says that man is getting smaller, weaker and dumber. Scientists say that this is because of negative mutations in our genes. However, they have never been able to adequately explain exactly why this happens. Let me tell you a little story.

Once upon a time man was very primitive.  He often lived in caves.  Then, overnight in evolutionary terms, homo sapiens suddenly appeared.  He was bigger and smarter than his predecessors. He became a farmer instead of a hunter.  It takes millions of years for a species to evolve, but in just 10,000 years or so man went from cave-dwelling to exploring outer space.  Such a spike in evolution is unheard of.  The explanation for this, therefore, obviously lies outside the bounds of normal evolution.

So, how did this happen and how do you reconcile this with the fact that man is now getting dumber? Here’s how.

At various times, man received a contribution of DNA from outside his own species (think: Directed Panspermia).  Man went from a hominid to a fully-formed human. That new DNA was primarily responsible for man’s ascension to the top of the evolutionary ladder.  The problem was, however, that the donation of DNA was limited and the majority of humans remained at lower levels of evolution.  Over time, the number of people with advanced DNA became a smaller and smaller percentage of the total population, especially as populations grew.

NOTE: Of the seven billion people on the planet, six billion were added in the last 200 years, as living conditions improved dramatically.

Man was still relatively backward as late as 1600 AD (the end of the Dark Age) as the Sumerian Civilization of 3500 BC was actually more advanced. Man had actually de-evolved for a period of about 5,000 years.  Then we went into the Age of Enlightenment and soon thereafter the Industrial Revolution. Uber-geniuses like Edison, Einstein and Tesla were the driving force behind the rise in man’s living standards. For example, it was only in the last 150 years that we got electricity, telephones, cars, airplanes and computers.  Yet, science says that man got dumber.  Why?

In genetic terms, it’s really very simple.  The burgeoning world population, for the most part, produced progressively dumber people. Fewer and fewer people retained the advanced DNA that propagated our species in the first place.  So, the intelligence of the “average” person went down. Eventually, man will return to his DNA state from before the injection of new DNA.  In other words, we will continue to get smaller, weaker and dumber until we return to our “natural state.”

Unless, of course, we get another injection of DNA.

 Here’s a link to a related story – http://thetruthwins.com/archives/scientists-discover-proof-that-humanity-is-getting-dumber-smaller-and-weaker  

“The secret of DNA’s success is that it carries information like that of a computer program, but far more advanced. Since experience shows that intelligence is the only presently acting cause of information, we can infer that intelligence is the best explanation for the information in DNA.” –  Jonathan Wells, biologist

California is ablaze today, but the politicians are incendiary.  Even AOC chimed in saying, “This is what climate change looks like.” There are a couple of problems with AOC’s statement.

First and foremost, there has been no climate change in California.  The summer was, in fact, quite pleasant.  The fires themselves were directly or indirectly man-made.  Light a fire and blame it on climate change.  Nice. Finally, the fires are almost impossible to control because of decades of environmental mismanagement by the State of California.

AOC went on to say that things will only get worse unless we reduce carbon emissions by half in the next ten years. What happened to us all dying in 12 years unless carbon emissions are reduced to zero?  Seems like she’s seriously backtracking here.  Furthermore, the U.S. has actually been reducing emissions, unlike the two serious polluters in the world, China and India, where carbon emissions are getting worse every year. Maybe, AOC and Greta Thunberg should consider taking their dog and pony show to China instead, where it might actually do some good.

Perhaps, however, they should just stop propagating their false claims of climate change altogether. After all, AOC’s former chief-of-staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, has publicly admitted that the Green New Deal was not primarily about the environment; that it was about changing Western Civilization’s economic system. Guess who else agrees with him- the United Nations.  Referring to the Paris Climate Accord, Christiana Fuentes, former head of the United Nations global warming agency, said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model (capitalism) that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”  

 

Epilogue

The world isn’t going to be devastated in 12 years. Miami is not going to disappear in a few years due to rising sea levels (as AOC has stated) and brush fires is a problem that man has created, and can therefore fix himself. The kicker is that CO2 is actually good for the planet because plants/crops need it to grow. That’s a scientific fact. Besides, the average global temperature is currently much lower than it’s been for most of the last 600 million years. 

Some of the environmental problems that the world has experienced in the last 50 years or so were indeed man-made. Many of them, however, were created intentionally to promote a political agenda. That is, you create a problem and then when people demand a solution, you give them one, something that fits your ideology and goals. As environmental scientist Delgado Domingos said, “The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control …Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense.” 

The Blue-Eyed Gods

10/25/2019

Some Australian aboriginals have blue eyes.  So, where did they get them from? From Africa? Not a chance.

The “Out Of Africa” theory concerning the evolution of Homo sapiens was popularized in the 1980s with the work of molecular biologists Alan Wilson and Rebecca Cann. They have since said that their initial conclusion was incorrect. That’s because advances in DNA studies has changed the scientific landscape. A recent DNA study by Watson and Cann shows that the origins of man can be traced back 400,000 years to Australia through Australian aboriginal mitochondrial DNA.  In other words, life began in Australia, mate.

So, where did some of the Australian aboriginals get blue eyes (and blond hair) from, especially since blue eyes and blond hair are recessive genes. Since recessive genes can only come from a different ancestral gene pool, blue eyes, therefore, had to have come from the “gods”.  In scientific circles, it’s sometimes referred to as Directed Panspermia and it’s the brainchild of Francis Crick who won the Nobel Prize for coming up with the double-helix structure of DNA.  

Note: Of course, no one even mentions that the Australian aboriginals themselves said that they came from the Pleiades. 

That’s not to say that all humans came from the same ancestral gene pool. Obviously, there was more than one Mitochondrial Eve. After all, where did Homo sapiens get their different skull types from and what is the origins of Rh negative blood? Science has never been able to answer those questions. With respect to skulls, science has obscured the fact that historically certain people on this planet had an elongated skull, including King Tut of Egypt and, yet, King Tut has been linked through DNA tests to most people currently living in Europe (Caucasians, that is). The truth is that King Tut was Caucasian, with an elongated skull!  

“Interestingly enough, this might lead to what some would consider to be a politically incorrect worldview. That is, the difference in races is caused by man’s evolution from more than one gene pool. In other words, not all of our genes came “out of Africa.” Now, you may be wondering why you haven’t heard about this before.  Like I said, it’s politically incorrect – a dirty little secret that has been intentionally suppressed from the history books…but, of course, now you know.” – The Ethical Warrior, Does God Have Blue Eyes?

Greta Thunberg says that the science is settled. So, why doesn’t NASA and the World Meteorological Organization agree with her?

Headline: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Proposes Zero-Carbon Airplanes

Comment: Good luck with running planes on anything but fossil fuel, especially if we only have 12 years left.  A good first step, however, would be to eliminate private jets. Unfortunately, the climate alarmists will never allow it because the elites, and the climate alarmists themselves, would lose their favorite means of transportation. Going to Davos, anyone?

Headline: Greta Thunberg In Iowa City: U.N. Climate Action Summit A Failure

Thunberg said world leaders are uncomfortable standing behind the science.

Comment: Actually, world leaders are uncomfortable standing behind a hoax, even one propagated by the U. N. itself. The reason is that they can see that it will destroy their own country.

Headline: NASA Admits That Climate Change Occurs Because of Changes In Earth’s Solar Orbit, and Not Because of SUVs or Fossil Fuels

Comment: It’s called the Milankovitch Cycles, for anyone who wants to research it.

Headline: Global Warming: Britain Braces for Coldest Winter in 30 Years

Comment: Some meteorologists are saying that the 2019-2020 cold spell could be as severe as the winter of 1963, believed to have been the coldest in 200 years (dating back to the last mini ice-age).

Headline: Top Level Climate Modeler Criticizes Nonsense of Global Warming Crisis

Comment: One of the world’s top meteorologists is Dr. Mototaka Nakamura from Japan who earned his Doctor of Science from MIT. He’s come out against the theory of global warming and the climate crisis proclamations of Greta Thunberg and AOC.

Commentary:

Recently, over 500 scientists and climate professionals wrote a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations appealing for an open debate on climate change. This is what the letter said:

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation. There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

And why does the U.N., itself, say that climate change has nothing to do with environmental science but rather is a solution to a political issue? And why do climate alarmists ignore what the U.N. has openly admitted themselves?

Quote of the day

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” – Delgado Domingos, environmental scientist

When it comes to convincing Americans that they should be concerned about climate change, the political rhetoric has been a failure. So, now we have kids lecturing the adults in an attempt to have the kids do what the politicians have been unsuccessful in doing. Today’s headlines tell the story:

Headline: Macron Slams Greta Thunberg After Teenage Activist Sues France Over Climate – But Leaves Out China

After browbeating the U.N. for stealing her childhood, Thunberg proclaimed, “People are suffering, people are dying, entire ecosystems are collapsing…We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.”

The pushback, however, has been brutal: “Maybe China is backing her so she can destroy other nations’ industries so China gets what remains of Western manufacturing” and “Good morning to everybody except China for being the biggest polluter in the world yet somehow escaping the wrath of Greta Thunberg.”

Another headline reads as follows: Child Psyop Puppet Greta Loses It, Screams About Mass Extinction From Carbon Dioxide, Oblivious To The Fact That CO2 Turns The World Green

Comment: Apparently, some people still don’t understand that the core message of climate change is that CO2 kills the planet when the science is irrefutable – CO2 is necessary for life.

Headline: Depopulation Is The Answer To Climate Change

Comment: Actually, climate change is the tail wagging the dog. The real objective is depopulation. As Bill Gates told TED, we have to reduce CO2 to zero. In other words, everyone will have to die. No joke.

Headline: In Letter To U.N., Scientists Say There Is No Climate Emergency

Comment: And NASA, the World Meteorologist Organization and Nobel Laureate Ivor Giaever (among many others) agree.

Humor of the day:

Headline: Ocasio-Cortez Flew Plane Across The Country To Rally For Climate Change

Comment: What did you expect? There’s always been two sets of rules – one for the elites and one for the masses.  It’s always been that way and it always will.  Ocasio-Cortez does not represent the people – she represents the elites.

 

 

 

Human Roots

09/24/2019

 

Many years ago, there was a TV mini-series called Roots which was extremely popular.  The answer to its popularity was really quite simple.  People wanted to know about their heritage. In the past, I have written extensively about the roots of the human species. However, readers seemingly can’t get enough. So, here is another installment. Hope you like it.

Man has been forever searching for himself, gazing up into the heavens hoping to find a clue about his past.  Movies have captured the general essence of man’s search; movies like ET, Close Encounters of The Third Kind and 2001 Space Odyssey come immediately to mind.

The thing is that man has been looking to the stars in search of extraterrestrials in an effort to better understand himself when the real answer lies much closer to home. It’s sort of like the Acres of Diamonds story. If you’ve never heard of it, you should check it out. It’s well worth the read.

Man really needs to look at himself before going off-planet looking for the unknown. After all, the physiology and chemistry of the human body is not natural to planet Earth. Then there’s the elephant in the room.  I’m talking about the different human races.

The different races are often distinguished by different colored skin, different colored hair and different colored eyes.  Most of all, there’s the differences in the human skull which cannot be explained by evolutionary theory. In fact, evolutionary theory can’t even explain evolution itself. Something as basic as the Cambrian Explosion renders evolutionary theory incomplete, at best.  The scientific record shows that evolution happens dramatically in incredible spikes, whereas evolutionary theory calls for inordinately long periods of time with only minor, gradual changes.

So, the $64,000 question is this: Why do we have different races at all?  Why are we so different and how did we get that way? The answer is, in reality, quite simple.  Unfortunately, for some, it is a truth that flies in the face of their own belief systems. The answer is that man, himself, is an extraterrestrial.

The theory behind this has been around since at least the 1970s.  It seriously started with Francis Crick, who got the Nobel Prize for his ground-breaking discovery on the structure of DNA. During his research, Crick realized that DNA could not have evolved naturally.  As a result, Crick and Leslie Orgel, proposed the theory of Directed Panspermia. Check out the movie Prometheus if you want to see what that might look like in real life. 

With respect to the question as to why there are different races, that answer is also amazingly quite simple. The human race was genetically engineered by advanced extraterrestrial civilizations… which is why man, himself, is an extraterrestrial.  For example, DNA researchers have found that Homo sapiens cross-bred with an unknown species in ancient times.

Of course politics being what it is, the masses are not supposed to know about their roots.  Otherwise, people might question who really holds the power, in which case governments and religions could fall.  It’s a dirty little secret that you weren’t supposed to know about…but, of course, now you know.

“Some of the aboriginals of Australia have blue eyes and blond hair.  How did that happen without blue-eyed gods?” The Ethical Warrior, Blue-Eyed Gods