CNN recently reported that a team of scientists from Harvard and Yale Universities proposes spraying sun-dimming chemicals into the Earth’s atmosphere so that the increased pollution levels would block sunlight and halt global warming. Their computer models indicate that this process could cut the rate of global warming in half.  Never mind that scientists now admit that there is very little global warming – that their previous computer models were seriously flawed, and never mind that the entire planet, then, would be contaminated from the fallout of the spraying (as reported in a BBC documentary on the subject).

An article in Natural News, gives an analysis of the agenda behind this new proposed plan. To begin with, these are the very same scientists that previously claimed that chemtrails was a conspiracy theory and now they, themselves, want to chemtrail the entire planet, only now they want to call it “stratospheric aerosol injection.” According to the article, dimming the sun would actually produce global cooling and could have devastating consequences on the planet’s ecosystems. That’s because plants depend on solar radiation for photosynthesis, which uses carbon dioxide as a fuel and produces oxygen as a byproduct. Reducing solar radiation through “stratospheric aerosol injection” would seriously affect the greening of the planet and lead to food crop failures. Further, the oxygen production of plants would be seriously affected and pose a grave risk to the human species. If you wanted humans to thrive on planet Earth, you would not unleash mass pollution (billions of tons of sulfur dioxide/smog) and reduce CO2 levels. Instead, you would do exactly the opposite. That is, reduce pollution and support plant life and food production through higher levels of CO2.

Obviously, I’ve hardly scratched the surface of the material covered in this article.  To get all the details, go to the following link:


“Climate change is real…that is true, but it’s a meaningless statement.  Climate change is of course real.  Climate has been changing for all of earth’s history.”  –  Steve Goreham, Executive Director of the Climate Change Coalition of America


For a video on Steve Goreham’s speech on climate science, go to




What Is A Bank?


It’s a seemingly odd question which was prompted by a comment I received the other day. Surely, everyone knows what a bank is, don’t they?

Actually, I’m not so sure. Here’s, perhaps a different perspective, although maybe it’s old news to some.  A bank is an entity that “borrows” money from the general public, generally at little to no interest, and then relends it back to the public at market interest rates.  Does that sound right to you?

Well, consider that when you open up an account with a bank, the money is legally no longer yours.  Any monies that you deposit with the bank belongs to them and you become simply a creditor of the bank. Of course, you can have the money back any time you like, but if the bank goes bankrupt first you better hope that the FDIC bails you out.  I think you and I are in the wrong business, although my mother always wanted me to be a banker.  Maybe, she knew something.

A lot of scientific research seems to be taking place in one of the few frontiers still available to man – inside the Earth.  For example, an article published in the journal Nature states that researchers believe that a vast water reservoir lies beneath the mantle of the Earth.

Then, there’s a team of scientists from Harvard University who believe that they have found evidence that the Earth is really a planet within a planet. This was apparently due to a “worlds in collision” scenario.

Finally, scientists trying to determine where mysterious ‘ghost particles’ called neutrinos come from, found them – coming from inside the planet. According to these scientists, the neutrinos are responsible for the majority of the heat produced by planet Earth.  Interestingly enough, neutrinos are the result of decay of nuclear elements, in other words radioactivity.  So it’s possible that an inner sun could very well be the source of the heat!

To sum it up, here’s what we may have inside of planet Earth -a sun, lots of water and a small planetary body.  Well, the scientists from Harvard University drew a picture of their version of what the inner earth looks like.  Oddly enough, they pictured that the Earth was hollow at the north pole and south poles, each pole with an entrance going inside the planet to reach the inner world. Sound familiar?


“Truth is stranger than fiction, but is because fiction is obligated to stick to possibilities; truth isn’t.”  – Mark Twain

What Is A Matrix?


The matrix is basically a computer simulation.

Physicist James Gates discovered that scientific theories which describe the fundamental nature of the universe contain embedded computer codes.  In other words, physicists’ formula scribbled on their blackboards can be broken down into binary code (1s and 0s, just like in your own computer’s software).

Think of it. Computer code has been found in the very fabric of reality itself, meaning that everything is programmed. Our world is a program running on someone’s hard disk. You can argue whether the programmer is God, an advanced intelligent race of beings or maybe just artificial intelligence, but it apparently has been programmed nonetheless.  The Big Bang obviously occurred when the program was turned on!



According to cosmologist Max Tegmark, everything in the universe is part of a mathematical structure. Everything in nature is full of patterns such as the Golden Ratio and the Fibonacci sequence, which are mathematically based. As Joseph Gordon-Levitt put it,“The spiral in a snail’s shell is the same mathematically as the spiral in the Milky Way galaxy, and it’s also the same mathematically as the spirals in our DNA.” My question is this. What kind of intelligence does it take to make that happen exactly that way?


 “There’s a one in billions chance that we’re not living in a computer simulation.”

              – Elon Musk


“It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you to the truth. What truth? That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind.”  – Morpheus, from the movie “The Matrix”

Yes, the makers of the Matrix movie were sending us a message about our reality – that we do in fact live in such a matrix. In that vein, the Humans Are Free website posted an article listing the following sixteen reasons why they believe that we are living in a matrix:


  • You pay taxes to people you’d like to see locked up in jail.
  • You go to the doctor, but you’re still sick.
  • You’ve picked Team Democrat or Team Republican and argue with your friends, family and co-workers about politics.This is what the control strategy of divide and conquer looks like in our society.
  • You work hard doing something you hate to earn fiat dollars.
  • You’re willing to accrue personal debt to fund the acquisition of a consumer-oriented lifestyle.
  • You converse with real people about the ongoing happenings of TV shows.
  • You don’t have anything to hide from total surveillance.
  • You think the world would be safer it only governments had guns.The willingness to forego your right to self-defense is a sign that you’ve relegated personal responsibility to someone else. Having the masses abdicate personal responsibility is one of the most important aspects of controlling them.
  • You knowingly drink fluoridated water
  • You knowingly consume toxic poisons like MSG and Aspartame.
  • You depend on the pharmaceutical industrial complex for the management of your own mental health.
  • You haven’t yet stopped watching your local and national news programming.The mainstream news mediais a tool of control and manipulation, and by continuing to support their ideas and world views by giving them your attention you are volunteering to be a slave to this not-so-subtle form of mental programming. Even the local news is scripted at the national level by agents of the handful of corporations tasked with shaping our opinions of events.
  • You’re more concerned with televised sports or other mindless distractions than you are with the quality of your natural environment.
  • You’re skeptical of any area of life that hasn’t been ‘proven’ or validated by modern science.
  • You’ve never questioned the popularized version of ancient history and the origins of our civilization.
  • You haven’t yet realized that you are a spiritual being having a human experience.


I’ve been asked many times how much do I think that man really knows.  Because the matrix disguises reality, I would rate man’s understanding as a negative number.  The reason is that what we think we know, but don’t, far exceeds what we actually know. This has nothing to do with intelligence, but everything to do with awareness.

Our perception of reality is based on the mind (conscious and subconscious) and its interpretation of electrical signals that it receives from our physical senses.  Subliminal messaging is everywhere in society today, from advertisements, to movies, to music to education, to the six-o’clock news. You may believe that you’re smart, and in fact you may be, but more often than not it’s impossible to overcome the conditioning of the matrix.


 “Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his system belief, or the stupidity of his contradictory behaviour.” – don Juan Matus

Over time the climate changes.  Yes of course it does, by definition.  Science has proven that many times over.  So what? You see, science has also definitely demonstrated that these earth (climate) changes happened even before man graced the planet. Yet, some people would like to blame the climate changes solely on the human race.

Before there was climate change, we had global warming.  Al Gore tried to explain global warming to the world using a “hockey stick” visual. Subsequently, Gore’s hockey stick and the science behind the theory was discredited which torpedoed the billions of dollars, in carbon taxes, that the world’s governments were supposed to pay because they would have been in violation of the new global warming paradigm. Even James Lovelock, the father of the global warming theory, acknowledged he had been unduly alarmist about climate change.

However, the global warming adherents didn’t do away quietly.  Rather, they simply reinvented their theory under the label of “climate change.” It’s like motherhood and apple pie. Who could deny that the climate changes? After all, the weather always gets either warmer or cooler, right?

Unfortunately, for them, they forgot about the science, like what comes from years of scientific study based on observations (like from tree rings and ice cores). Now that’s real science, as opposed to the computer models they actually used.  Of course, computer models, by necessity, are based on assumptions as opposed to observations.

Aside: As you’ve heard me say before, assumptions are a tricky proposition when it comes to theories (and logic problems).  Just ask Epicurus.

One of the supposed bad guys in climate change is CO2 levels. I say supposed. The thinking is that increased CO2 levels ultimately result in higher surface temperatures.  The problem is that the science doesn’t support that theory. Ice core studies show that increases in CO2 actually follow rather than precede increases in temperatures.  Sure man is adding to the CO2 levels, but that’s actually a good thing since increased CO2 levels green the planet.  That’s because CO2 is the primary food of plants. Without CO2, we would have no plants, and without plants there would be no oxygen, ergo no humans.  If you want to read up on the subject, I can recommend The Positive Impact of Human CO2 Emissions On the Survival of Life on Earth which was written by Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore.

Aside: In the Paleozoic and Mesozoic eras, among others, there were long periods during which the levels of CO2 were much higher than today, yet the temperatures were far colder.

Fast forward to 2015A NASA study showed that Antarctica was actually gaining ice mass thanks to increased snowfall. Obviously, there was no global warming there.

Fast forward to 2017: A shocking admission was published in Nature Geoscience.  Climate change scientists admitted that the computer models predicting dramatically increased temperatures were wrong.  It seems that there has actually was no increase in global surface temperatures from 1998-2012.

Fast forward to 2018: At a climate change conference in London, climate scientists were shocked to learn that there was yet another scandal with respect to the science behind climate change. That is, a fundamental error in the calculations of ocean temperatures was revealed to the attendees. Again, the overly aggressive assumptions used in the computer models was to blame.

Aside: Of course, it’s also possible that the computer models were rigged to produce the desired outcome. That’s because government actions have often corrupted science, which has been flooded by money to produce politically correct results.

Since 1998, more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition that states “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of . . . carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” So, it turns out that the climate consensus was wrong all along.  As William Happer, professor emeritus of physics at Princeton University and a member of the National Academy of Sciences, put it, “It is time for governments to finally admit the truth about global warming. Warming is not the problem. Government action is the problem.”


“In science consensus is irrelevant. … There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.” – Michael Crichton


The American Dream


Eugene Ionesco once said that, “Ideologies separate us.  Dreams and anguish bring us together.” That was once true, but I challenge if it is still true today.  Just like Martin Luther King, you have to have a dream.  That dream, of course, was The American Dream…and that dream may well be dying.

As I mentioned in a recent post, Americans of all stripes fought together side-by-side in two world wars because they had a dream.  It was a dream of freedom, to be lived in a country (America) that cherished individual liberty.  It was a dream that almost everyone shared and so our differences were secondary. We could coexist with all of our imperfections, our biases and our differences in cultural values.

However, today, many people no longer have that same dream.  They would rather destroy what we have and start over.  They want to “fundamentally transform” America.  The problem, though, is that their vision is for a country where They get to impose their ideology and their values on the rest.  However, you will never know that is their objective. You will only hear that They represent you, the people, against the establishment.  However, the problem is that They are the establishment.  They are the 1%.

You need to understand the propaganda that’s used to convince people to vote them into power. So, when They ask you to join The Resistance to bring down the establishment, what They are really saying is that They want to remain in power only without being encumbered with the chains of a Republic.  The only rule of law would then be their rule of law.  There would be a new Golden Rule (i.e. he who has the most gold rules).

When They ask you to eradicate the white race, what They are really saying is that They want the white race marginalized so that it can not compete with them for power…for They are the establishment, They are the elite (mostly, the white race).

In the course of human affairs, revolutions are a fact of life, maybe, in some cases, even a necessity. After all, that’s how we wound up with America in the first place.  However, beware of those offering a new form of government where everyone will get their needs met (like, say, free healthcare for everyone).  There is no system that can provide everything to everyone. History has shown that our current form of government is the only one that can endure and prosper over time. The great political thinkers understood that.  Here’s a sample of what some of them said:


“When people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic”.  – Benjamin Franklin

“The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.”  – Frederic Bastiat

“The trouble with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.”           – Margaret Thatcher

        “The goal of socialism is communism.”  – Vladimir Lenin



There is a reason why the middle class is disappearing in America.  It’s not an accident. The middle class is being intentionally destroyed because it is the only group of people that will insist upon maintaining civil liberties.  Everyone else will simply insist on having others (read: the government) support them. You see, most of the middle class believes in The American Dream.


You asked, so here it is. Pictures of the recent wildfire in Northern California reveal that the town of Paradise, California was incinerated. It was not burned to the ground, it was incinerated. The town looks like a war zone.

There was nothing left of the structures in a town that was devastated by what the media is calling a forest fire.  Absolutely nothing. The town, itself, was nestled in a forest and there were many trees ringing nearly every home.  The homes were literally melted to the ground, metal and all. However, the trees were virtually untouched…and they call that a forest fire?  What I call it is impossible since a natural fire would never burn like that.

Many people died in the fire, perhaps as many as 1,000. Where’s the public outrage? Where?  I can only surmise that the media has been told not to talk about directed energy weapons.  I guess it’s one of those dirty little secrets that the public is not supposed to know about…but, of course, now you know.

Yes, I’m finally back home after having been evacuated because of one of the California wildfires.  What a relief.  What most people don’t realize, though, is that both of the major California wildfires started on a property owned by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E).  Two wildfires with a similar origin.  What are the odds? Further, a law signed by California Governor Jerry Brown earlier this year effectively limits how much in damages PG&E can be assessed. How did they know about the coming fires? Just convenient timing, I guess.  Never mind that the fire in Southern California started near the site of the biggest nuclear accident in U. S. history, one that very few people have ever heard of.  The site has never been cleaned up and today still poses a serious health risk for local residents.  Now, the recent wildfire has spread the toxic chemicals and nuclear waste which were located on that site. The actions of Governor Brown show that he is more interested in advancing Agenda 21 and high-speed rail systems than public safety. Thanks Gov. for the exploding smart meters and the coming eminent domain.

Of course, the wildfires are just one of the many strange things that are occurring now on almost a daily basis. For example, identity politics is destroying the very fabric of society and most people either don’t get it or don’t care, or worse yet are all for it because the rhetoric advances their own personal agenda.  You know things are really bad when racists call others racist to deflect from their own bad behavior. Or how about calling a Jewish person, wearing a yarmulke, a Nazi? Perhaps, you, yourself, have even been subjected to some kind of social targeting so you understand firsthand what I’m talking about.

The world is going through a change, of sorts; some would even call it the End Times. While it’s not the end of the world, it is the end of an era.  When historians look back on these times, I’m sure that they will give a name to it. What I see is that one of the things that defines what is happening is that it is a time of disclosure – and more disclosure is coming – much more.

The disclosures will be unsettling for most people as the truth can be 180 degrees from what they believe.  So, they will initially resist any new paradigm. Arthur Schopenhauer called it the Three Stages of Truth.  He put it this way: “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”  We seem to be in the second stage at the moment.

The disclosures will cover all facets of human activity on the planet.  Many of the disclosures will be unpleasant topics, things that we’ve tried to suppress from our own awareness; things like pedophilia, human trafficking and government corruption. Yes, there was a “Russian collusion” (of sorts) but it was the opposite of what you may have been led to believe. Julian Assange might well clear this up yet. This is truly the age when up is down, good is bad and stupid is smart. So, be prepared for more shocks to the system.

You may be wondering why disclosure is about to happen at this time.  Why now?  Why didn’t it happen earlier, you might ask?  It’s a fair question, even if you didn’t ask it.  The overly simplistic answer is that people have to be ready for the truth.  There has to be a reasonable number of people who can process what might be a total change in their belief systems.  After all, there is no reason to teach advanced mathematics to a bunch of ten-year-olds.

So, welcome to the age of disclosure. The disclosures are in essence dirty little secrets that you previously weren’t supposed to know about…but, now, you’ll know. One caveat, though. Not everyone wants you to know the truth.  It benefits those who seek to control others to keep the masses asleep. So, mixed in with the disclosures will be a heavy dose of disinformation. Therefore, caveat emptor.


“If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts.”  – George H.W. Bush

So, I’ve had a plethora of questions about my recent post, “ Dr. Einstein, Reality and Schrodinger’s Cat.” It’s a tricky question about Schrodinger’s cat.  Was it alive or dead? Before I give you the answer, though, a little background is probably in order.

The universe is made up of atoms, right? Then there are electrons and quarks which are the basic building blocks of the atom (i.e. sub-atomic particles). However, scientists say that even with the electrons and quarks, the atom is essentially empty space. So, what does the universe consist of if everything is empty space?  The thing is, though, that empty space isn’t really empty. You see, empty space is teeming with life.  Teeming. It is a hotbed of constant creation and destruction which is the very fabric of reality (and all matter).

Let’s backtrack, though, for a second. Science is fundamentally a process of observation and measurement. In that regard, science has what some scientists refer to as a measurement problem. It’s all the fault of the atom. You see, the atom is the most mysterious object in all of creation.  That is, it only appears after it has first been observed and measured!!!

Aside: You might recall that an observation and measurement were at the heart of the Double-Slit Experiment that I mentioned in “Dr. Einstein, Reality and Schrodinger’s Cat” which prompted many of your questions.

Here’s the conundrum. An atom does not exist, as an atom, until an observer looks at it.  That is, the act of observation and measurement creates the atom, and by extension the whole universe. As physicist John Wheeler put it, “The universe does not exist ‘out there,’ independent of us. We are inescapably involved in bringing about that which appears to be happening. We are not only observers. We are participators.”

So, how does it all work, then?  Putting aside all the theories, the fancy formulae scribbled on chalkboards and the myriad of science textbooks, what exactly is reality? Well, physicist David Bohm says that the quantum field is the true source of our reality. However, according to this theory, our physical world is a projection from another realm, a deeper source of reality which is beyond space and time.  A projection you understand.  Holographic no doubt.  As John Horgan explained though in his book The End of Science, it is not possible to observe what exists beyond space and time by simply observing nature. Ah, yes, there’s the rub. The really scary thing is that scientists will never be able to prove what lies beyond space and time since they can’t observe beyond space and time.

Since science has reached it’s physical limitations, we live in a time when the great geniuses of science are, by necessity, theoretical physicists. That inevitably will probably lead to a philosophical discussion about God. However, at the moment, scientists typically avoid addressing the God question, especially since many scientists are atheists, though it does come up if only through some oblique references. Here’s a few examples:

  • “Life is the most mysterious of all the wonders of creation because atoms  have been assembled in such a way so that they can ponder their own existence.” – Martin Rees, astrophysicist (and an atheist)Aside: That’s exactly what we all have been doing since at least the time of the great Greek philosophers. Pondering our existence.  Needless to say, it takes intelligence to ponder one’s own existence.  That’s what sets man apart from all the other species.
  • “The cosmos is within us. We are made of star-stuff. We are a way for the universe to know itself.” – Carl Sagan, astronomer (and an atheist) Aside: How does the universe know itself without intelligence?
  • “Super-intelligence is the only good explanation for the origin of life and the complexity of nature.” – Antony Flew, a former atheist

So, one does not have to mention God (or even believe in God apparently) in order to understand that Creation could only have been facilitated through intelligence.



Back to Schrodinger’s cat. Actually, quantum mechanics says that Schrodinger’s cat was both alive and dead.  Both, you understand.  That’s because unobserved phenomenon can exist in dual states, or, as I would prefer to say, in an intricate web of infinite possibilities. That is, an atom is merely a possibility until it, the atom, is observed.  Pretty cool world, right? Of course, quantum mechanics also has the “many worlds” interpretation but that may be a bridge too far.

In the end, Schrodinger’s cat is all about choices since, as John Wheeler said, we are the observer. You have to choose.  You can either choose the blue pill or the red pill, but either way, it’s your choice.  As Morpheus said, “But I can only show you the door.  You’re the one who has to walk through it.”


“The doctrine that the world is made up of objects whose existence is independent of human consciousness turns out to be in conflict with quantum mechanics and with facts established by experiment.”  – Bernard d’Espagnat, physicist