The world is overflowing with toxins.  Everything is toxic including the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we consume. Add to that the harmful environment caused by modern technology and you get a deadly mix.

Here’s a brief overview:

The air is poisoned by nanosized aluminum, a result of geoengineering. Aluminum is also found in deodorants, food packaging and vaccines.

Our drinking water is poisoned with highly toxic fluoride. Fluoride is also included in pesticides, antibiotics, tea and toothpaste.

Some of the food we eat is poisoned with glyphosate, which is found in pesticides that are sprayed on crops. Also, many foods are genetically modified (GMO) resulting in harmful effects. As a result, GMOs have been banned in many countries – but not here.

In addition, wi-fi radiation (EMP) attacks the body’s immune system making it vulnerable to disease and other toxins. The worst of them all is 5G.

Why do you suppose that our environmental experts haven’t warned us about these things? Where’s the Sierra Cub when you really need them? Their voice has been muted. “Welcome to the new age, to the new age. I’m radioactive, radioactive.”

 

Epilogue

And don’t get me started on vaccinations.

 

Recommended reading:

“Toxins in the Bodies of Babies Leads to a Contaminated Generation”  Link:www.naturalnews.com/024104_chemicals_blood_newborns.html

 

 

Natural News just ran an expose entitled “Environmentalists Are At War With Life on Earth” – see link below. The central theme of the article is this: “photosynthesis requires sunlight, carbon dioxide and water to function, yet climate change propagandists have now declared war on two out of those three inputs required to sustain nearly all plant life on our planet.”

As the article stated, war has been declared on sunlight through various global engineering initiatives, the latest of which has been dubbed “global dimming”, a topic I covered recently (Geoengineering – An Exotic Name For Chemtrails, December 19, 2018).  The goal is “to pollute the skies and diminish the intensity of sunlight reaching all plant life on Earth.”  The endgame is to cripple global crop production which will suffer greatly without sufficient sunlight.

Then, there’s the curious case of the war on carbon dioxide.  I say curious because carbon dioxide is the “single most important nutrient to support plan life – forests, food crops and ocean life.”  Yet, no less than Al Gore wants to restrict the production of carbon dioxide and many world leaders have called for so-called “carbon taxes” to prevent the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  Wow! So, let’s restrict the amount of the most important plant life nutrient that can be put into the environment.

Note: Carbon taxes is a big part of the Yellow Vest protest in France.

While some people, no doubt, will consider this perspective to be very close to heresy, I feel that the article could have actually gone even further.  Point being that the article said that war has been declared on two of the three legs of photosynthesis. However, I would say that it’s actually all three.  You see there was no mention of the war on water, perhaps because it was considered beyond the scope of the article.  Many people are coming to realize that the technology, generally a combination of HAARP and chemtrails, exists to manipulate the weather, including violent storms.  For example, in Iran, lakes are turning into deserts and the lack of water is fast becoming a national security issue, not to mention having a devastating economic impact.  The Iran government has accused the United States of eco-terrorism through the use of technology to produce drought conditions in Iran (see link below). Supporting that idea is a statement by William Cohen, the then U.S. Secretary of Defense, who admitted that governments “are engaging… in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.”

Natural News also published an article on climate change (see link below) which is an interesting read and from which I have excerpted the following quotes:

In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All of these are caused by human intervention…The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.” – Aurelio Peccei, founder of the Club of Rome

Comment: The real enemy is humanity itself? The elites underlying agenda is to eliminate the enemy – humanity itself. That’s why they have developed the idea that man is responsible for climate change. That’s why we have the Georgia Guidestones. Get people to believe that man, himself, is the enemy. The endgame is transhumanism. That’s why physicist Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk view artificial intelligence as the greatest threat to the survival of the human species. Actually, there are two major contributors to climate change.  The overarching cause is that it is driven by the natural cycles of the sun.  The second cause is that it is intentionally created by man. Intentionally, you understand.  However, it is not created by the average person or by his activities on the planet (e.g. production of consumer goods).  Rather, it is intentionally created by the elites, a created crisis, so that they can provide the masses with the solution.

“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony, climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” – Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment

Comment: I guess this amounts to as close to a public admission that the global warming science is phony as we’re going to get. The “justice and equality in the world” phrase means that everyone will be treated equally (ergo: no middle class). Of course, there will always be an upper class who the rules don’t apply to – like Al Gore flying around in his private jet.

“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

Comment: Translation – We know we faked the global warming science. So, what? Keep your eyes on the ball (our agenda of total control).  It is the right thing for us (although not for the masses) and that is what matters.

If you are getting numb from all of this, I don’t blame you.  It is a lot to wrap one’s mind around.  If you’re one of those who touts climate change, I’m surprised that you’re still reading this. However, if you have an inquiring mind and want to understand this issue better, go research it yourself.  You certainly don’t have to take my word on it. Don’t believe the climate change pundits either.  They’re the ones who will tell you all about the supposed scientific consensus on the issue.  I said supposed. As William Casey, the then director of the CIA, said, “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

The climate change movement is not based on science nor is it environmental in nature (no pun intended). Rather, it is a political tool of control.  Just another tactic of the Deep State.

 

“The climate change movement is a death cult. Their target is photosynthesis, the basis of all sustainable, complex life on planet Earth.” – Natural News

 

Links:

(1) https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-01-10-environmentalists-are-at-war with-life-on-earth-total-collapse-of-ecosystem-the-real-goal-of-climate-propagandists.htm

 (2) https://www.naturalnewsblogs.com/climate-change-a-stalking-horse-for-world-government/

 (3) https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/iran-accuses-u-s-of-using-weather-weapons

Supposedly, chemtrails don’t exist.  Supposedly, it’s a conspiracy theory.  I said supposedly.

You see, Harvard scientists have said that they will attempt to replicate the climate-cooling effect of volcanic eruptions with what they say is a world-first solar geoengineering experiment which is set for early 2019.  The project, called The Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment, will inject chemicals into the air high above the earth in an attempt to reflect some of the sun’s rays back into space.

Their stated goal is to reduce global warming. I said stated goal, you understand. What we’re talking about here, though, is chemtrails. Of course, this would not be the “first” solar geoengineering experiment.  Far from it, since geoengineering has been going on for more than 40 years now. This is just their way of “coming out of the closet,” so to speak.

We can argue about how much global warming there has been in the last 140 years, or so, although the Goddard Institute for Space Studies reports that the Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change from 1880 to 2017 was just over one degree Celsius. So, in other words, very little warming over such a long period of time.

However, there is no argument over the fact that NASA reported that global temperatures for the two-year period February 2016 to February 2018 shows global average temperatures had the biggest two-year drop in the past century; or that the Weather Channel has stated that 2018 is the coldest winter, so far, in the last 50 years.  They reported that “We really face Global Cooling as this is now the third winter which this is becoming the colder with each passing year.”  Therefore, the Weather Channel haconfirms the NASA data that global warming has stopped and that we now have global cooling.

So, if there is no global warming, why would anyone want to go ahead with this experiment, considering all of the significant risks involved? We’re talking about the global impact on precipitation patterns, ozone depletion and crop yields, resulting in droughts, floods and extreme weather events. Because of the risks, climate geoengineering should be considered only as a last resort (according to the Institute of Physics).  Scientific American said more or less the same thing in an editorial they published entitled,The Hidden Dangers of Geoengineering.

By the way, who gave Harvard University the approval to go ahead with their little experiment?  After all, the United States has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement on climate change. Didn’t we?

 

“Playing with the Earth’s climate is a dangerous game with unclear rules.”  – Robert Jackson, director of Duke University’s Center on Global Change