One of the big lies about global warming is what is not being said. That is, we are currently in what is a historically cold period. Once you know this, you will understand that global warming is not a problem; it is actually necessary to sustain life on the planet. Temperatures need to go up as we are just coming out of a mini ice age. 

Not only are temperatures historically low, but CO2 levels are also historically low.  Historically, in warmer periods (with high CO2), the planet has actually had its most prosperous epochs.  For example, the Cambrian Explosion was responsible for the creation for much of the diversity in animal life on the planet. Here’s the kicker: Temperatures and CO2 levels were much higher then. Much higher.

The reason is that as temperatures and CO2 go up, the earth actually becomes greener and more conducive to life whereas when it gets colder, life on the planet can wither and die. That’s what you need to know.  Everything else is a major psyops.

For those of you who may be disappointed that the U.S. is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accords, you should know this.  The climate accords are not about environmental disaster, rather it is about economics and who controls the power to rule the planet. Remember, money rules the world.  As Christiana Figueres, the then head of the United Nations efforts to promote the Paris Climate Accords, admitted, the true objective of the climate accords is to destroy capitalism.

You probably don’t know this, but the two biggest polluters in the world (China and India) are basically exempt from the Paris Climate Accords in that they do not have to reduce carbon emissions (in fact, they are allowed to increase emissions). So, this whole thing is a smokescreen designed to adversely affect the economic systems of Western Civilization while boosting those of China and India. 

You may or may not agree with me on these points, but consider this. Did you expect the politicians to actually tell you the truth? Their approval rating falls off the map and yet some still defend their grand schemes. It proves that life hasn’t changed much in 500 years; that is, there are kings (the elites) and peasants, and of course we are the peasants. They keep getting richer while we keep getting poorer. The one true equalizer is death.  However, I seriously doubt that anyone (rich or poor) will die in our lifetime from global warming.

California is ablaze today, but the politicians are incendiary.  Even AOC chimed in saying, “This is what climate change looks like.” There are a couple of problems with AOC’s statement.

First and foremost, there has been no climate change in California.  The summer was, in fact, quite pleasant.  The fires themselves were directly or indirectly man-made.  Light a fire and blame it on climate change.  Nice. Finally, the fires are almost impossible to control because of decades of environmental mismanagement by the State of California.

AOC went on to say that things will only get worse unless we reduce carbon emissions by half in the next ten years. What happened to us all dying in 12 years unless carbon emissions are reduced to zero?  Seems like she’s seriously backtracking here.  Furthermore, the U.S. has actually been reducing emissions, unlike the two serious polluters in the world, China and India, where carbon emissions are getting worse every year. Maybe, AOC and Greta Thunberg should consider taking their dog and pony show to China instead, where it might actually do some good.

Perhaps, however, they should just stop propagating their false claims of climate change altogether. After all, AOC’s former chief-of-staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, has publicly admitted that the Green New Deal was not primarily about the environment; that it was about changing Western Civilization’s economic system. Guess who else agrees with him- the United Nations.  Referring to the Paris Climate Accord, Christiana Fuentes, former head of the United Nations global warming agency, said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model (capitalism) that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”  

 

Epilogue

The world isn’t going to be devastated in 12 years. Miami is not going to disappear in a few years due to rising sea levels (as AOC has stated) and brush fires is a problem that man has created, and can therefore fix himself. The kicker is that CO2 is actually good for the planet because plants/crops need it to grow. That’s a scientific fact. Besides, the average global temperature is currently much lower than it’s been for most of the last 600 million years. 

Some of the environmental problems that the world has experienced in the last 50 years or so were indeed man-made. Many of them, however, were created intentionally to promote a political agenda. That is, you create a problem and then when people demand a solution, you give them one, something that fits your ideology and goals. As environmental scientist Delgado Domingos said, “The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control …Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense.” 

Greta Thunberg says that the science is settled. So, why doesn’t NASA and the World Meteorological Organization agree with her?

Headline: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Proposes Zero-Carbon Airplanes

Comment: Good luck with running planes on anything but fossil fuel, especially if we only have 12 years left.  A good first step, however, would be to eliminate private jets. Unfortunately, the climate alarmists will never allow it because the elites, and the climate alarmists themselves, would lose their favorite means of transportation. Going to Davos, anyone?

Headline: Greta Thunberg In Iowa City: U.N. Climate Action Summit A Failure

Thunberg said world leaders are uncomfortable standing behind the science.

Comment: Actually, world leaders are uncomfortable standing behind a hoax, even one propagated by the U. N. itself. The reason is that they can see that it will destroy their own country.

Headline: NASA Admits That Climate Change Occurs Because of Changes In Earth’s Solar Orbit, and Not Because of SUVs or Fossil Fuels

Comment: It’s called the Milankovitch Cycles, for anyone who wants to research it.

Headline: Global Warming: Britain Braces for Coldest Winter in 30 Years

Comment: Some meteorologists are saying that the 2019-2020 cold spell could be as severe as the winter of 1963, believed to have been the coldest in 200 years (dating back to the last mini ice-age).

Headline: Top Level Climate Modeler Criticizes Nonsense of Global Warming Crisis

Comment: One of the world’s top meteorologists is Dr. Mototaka Nakamura from Japan who earned his Doctor of Science from MIT. He’s come out against the theory of global warming and the climate crisis proclamations of Greta Thunberg and AOC.

Commentary:

Recently, over 500 scientists and climate professionals wrote a letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations appealing for an open debate on climate change. This is what the letter said:

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to global warming, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation. There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

And why does the U.N., itself, say that climate change has nothing to do with environmental science but rather is a solution to a political issue? And why do climate alarmists ignore what the U.N. has openly admitted themselves?

Quote of the day

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” – Delgado Domingos, environmental scientist

Sweden doesn’t exist anymore.  What passes for Sweden today is a literal cesspool.  All the news coming out of Sweden confirms this.  Today’s headline tells the story:

Headline: Church Of Sweden Claims Jesus Christ Annointed Greta Thunberg As His Successor

Comment: Of course, they can claim whatever they want. By the way, has anyone in Sweden talked to Jesus lately?

Headline: Putin Shames Greta Thunberg and Her Handlers Over Environmental Agenda

Comment: Putin told Greta: “Go and explain to developing countries why they should continue living in poverty and not be like Sweden.”

Headline: “There Is No Climate Emergency:” Scientists Call For Reasoned Debate

Comment: This will never happen because, in any reasoned debate, it will have to be admitted that CO2 is a good thing for the planet.

Headline: Poland: Zero Emissions Is A Trillion-Dollar Fantasy

Comment: More bad news for Greta and AOC. People don’t like being told to destroy their own country.

I don’t think Shakespeare realized that someday the whole world would be rotten, not unlike his Denmark. Yesterday it was Italy, today it’s Sweden. The headline tells the story.

Headline: Sweden Makes It Legal For Jihadist Immigrants To Leave With The Intent of Committing Terror Attacks, Then Return

In an interview, a Swedish jihadi said that what is best for Sweden is Allah’s rules (Sharia Law), even if they run counter to Swedish culture and values. He said that  “I believe that Allah’s rules should prevail over all other laws.”

Comment: Sweden is an absolute mess.  First, they brought the world Greta Thunberg, now Sharia Law.

Headline: WSJ’s Freeman: 2017 Politico Investigation Puts Hillary Clinton In Ukraine Spotlight

Comment: And then John Kerry and then Barack Obama.

Headline: Global Warming Fraud Exposed In Pictures

From ZeroHedge comes the reposting of an article from Mike Shedlock on Mish Talk.  It’s mostly pictures, so here’s a link to the article and the pictures: https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/global-warming-fraud-exposed-pictures

Comment: As they say, a picture is worth a thousand words.

Headline: Chaffetz Explains Why Pelosi Hasn’t Held A Formal Vote On Impeachment (video)

According to Chaffetz, a formal vote would allow “the minority” to subpoena witnesses.

Comment: Yeah, but why would they want to follow the rules?

Humor of the day

Headline: Bill Maher: Fat Shaming Needs To Make A Comeback

Bill Maher “scoffs at the Democratic candidates who are fighting for health care coverage for people with preexisting conditions, when he says the most serious preexisting condition is obesity … yet it’s not only overlooked by the candidates, raising the subject is considered bullying.”

When it comes to convincing Americans that they should be concerned about climate change, the political rhetoric has been a failure. So, now we have kids lecturing the adults in an attempt to have the kids do what the politicians have been unsuccessful in doing. Today’s headlines tell the story:

Headline: Macron Slams Greta Thunberg After Teenage Activist Sues France Over Climate – But Leaves Out China

After browbeating the U.N. for stealing her childhood, Thunberg proclaimed, “People are suffering, people are dying, entire ecosystems are collapsing…We are in the beginning of a mass extinction.”

The pushback, however, has been brutal: “Maybe China is backing her so she can destroy other nations’ industries so China gets what remains of Western manufacturing” and “Good morning to everybody except China for being the biggest polluter in the world yet somehow escaping the wrath of Greta Thunberg.”

Another headline reads as follows: Child Psyop Puppet Greta Loses It, Screams About Mass Extinction From Carbon Dioxide, Oblivious To The Fact That CO2 Turns The World Green

Comment: Apparently, some people still don’t understand that the core message of climate change is that CO2 kills the planet when the science is irrefutable – CO2 is necessary for life.

Headline: Depopulation Is The Answer To Climate Change

Comment: Actually, climate change is the tail wagging the dog. The real objective is depopulation. As Bill Gates told TED, we have to reduce CO2 to zero. In other words, everyone will have to die. No joke.

Headline: In Letter To U.N., Scientists Say There Is No Climate Emergency

Comment: And NASA, the World Meteorologist Organization and Nobel Laureate Ivor Giaever (among many others) agree.

Humor of the day:

Headline: Ocasio-Cortez Flew Plane Across The Country To Rally For Climate Change

Comment: What did you expect? There’s always been two sets of rules – one for the elites and one for the masses.  It’s always been that way and it always will.  Ocasio-Cortez does not represent the people – she represents the elites.

 

 

 

The world is on strike, sort of. That is, some people are demonstrating with regards to the climate change issue.  Meanwhile, one of the biggest environmental issues in the world goes completely unnoticed. That is, people in some cities in China can hardly breathe because the air pollution is so bad. Today’s headlines tell the real story:

Headline: World’s Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitter China Taps Out Of Global Climate Strike

Comment: The U.S. already leads the world in reducing its carbon footprint.  However, China continues to lead the world in increasing its emissions and nobody bothers to even say boo to them.  Yes, China is in the Paris Climate Accords, but the agreement actually allows for them to increase emissions! So, China (and India) simply thumb their noses at the world on this issue.

Comment: Even if one believed that the Green New Deal was necessary, implementing it in this country is meaningless unless China and India take the lead in participating.

Headline: Bernie Sanders Makes A Startling Admission During The First Leg of MSNBC’s Two Day Climate Forum

From the article: “Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders admitted Thursday that some of environmental policies will likely hurt working class Americans.”

Comment: Dah! What would you expect if you’re going to kill off the entire fossil fuel industry? 

Headline: Climate Activists Try To Explain Why They Use Products Made From Fossil Fuels.

Comment: It’s cool to demonstrate, but it’s too much of an effort to actually do anything about it; like, stop using plastic products.

Headline: The End of the World Is Coming According to Jerry Nadler

Comment: At least, he’s giving us 50 years instead of the 12 years that AOC claims. . More good news according to Jerry – 50 years is only a maybe, whereas AOC says definitely in 12. Guess he’s walking back the climate change predictions.

 

Opinion piece: 

Sixteen year-old Greta Thunberg, from Sweden, is an environmental activist who was recently invited to speak before a U. S. congressional committee on climate issues. Why would a sixteen year-old (from Sweden no less) be invited to come to this country to speak to Congress (as an expert) on behalf of future generations? What does a sixteen year-old know anyway about climate science?  I’ll give her credit for one thing, though.  She recommended that Congress talk to scientists about the issue.  One huge caveat, though. It will have to be my scientists, not hers, that makes the recommendations because hers are hacks for the United Nations.  By the way, students openly admit to climate change indoctrination at school.  They were even given the day off school to protest on Climate Strike Day.  Since when is it allowed to politicize the schools?

 

Humor of the day:

Headline: Doomsday Predictions That Didn’t Happen: Think Tank Compiles Decades’ Worth of Dire Climate Predictions

Comment: The latest is that AOC says that Miami has only a few years left before it is totally devastated. However, I don’t see anyone moving out of the Miami area (not even the climate change activists). Besides, Obama just bought a new place in Martha’s Vineyard and it’s supposed to suffer the same fate as Miami.

The biggest lie ever told is that something that is essential to all life is bad for the planet. What is it? Believe it or not, it’s CO2 – carbon dioxide.

This is not some misinterpretation.  This is not even faulty science.  This is an outright lie.  The lie of climate change/global warming that CO2 is a killer.

Carbon dioxide is a critical part of the photosynthesis process that creates life in plants. Without photosynthesis, no life would be possible on the planet. You can read up on this in any elementary science book. From the website whatisphotosynthesis.net comes this explanation of photosynthesis:

“… the process of photosynthesis which allows plants to convert light energy into usable food and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen into our environment.”

It’s a symbiotic exchange. Plants require the carbon dioxide that animals give off, while animals require the oxygen plants produce. Without photosynthesis from plants, the oxygen on our planet would run out and all human life would end. Then, the plants would die without the carbon dioxide that animals and humans produce.

A scientific study published in Nature Climate Change described the vital role of carbon dioxide in sustaining life on the planet.  They said that the planet is getting greener because of an increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  Greener and healthier, you understand – because of carbon dioxide. So, here’s a real simple way to think of this:

Carbon dioxide = life

No carbon dioxide= no life

This issue hit the headlines recently because of a tweet by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a prominent supporter of the Green New Deal.  AOC said, “We either decarbonize & cut emissions, or we don’t & let people die.”  There’s the lie. Remember carbon dioxide = life. So, what does AOC want to do?  Exactly the opposite.  She wants no carbon dioxide.

Okay, so you may have found the science lesson interesting but what does any of this have to do with you, right? Well, there’s a presidential election in 2020 and many of the people who are in the running are also supporting the Green New Deal. So, obviously, they are okay with no carbon dioxide/no life.  Are you?

 

Epilogue

Out in a remote part of Elbert County, Georgia, there stands a massive monument with an alarming message.  The monument is popularly called The Georgia Guidestones.  Inscribed on the monument is someone’s vision of a different set of Ten Commandments.  The First Commandment is to “maintain humanity under 500 million in perpetual balance with nature.” Any guess as to how they are going to reduce the world population down from 7 billion to 500 million?

Well, Bill Gates does. At a TED conference presentation on reducing world population, Gates said that we have to reduce CO2 to zero. To zero. Remember, no carbon dioxide = no life. Gates even proposed a solution towards that end – vaccines, courtesy of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Just connect the dots. Green New Deal…Georgia Guidestones…and Bill Gates…  reduce world population by getting rid of CO2.

CO2, it’s absolutely essential for all life on the planet.  That’s a scientific fact. Yet, people like AOC and Bill Gates will try to tell you otherwise.  Sometimes the bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell.

 

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” – Delgado Domingos, environmental scientist

…well, apparently not Petteri Taalas, the head of the World Meteorologist Organization (WMO). Taalas gave an interview to a Finnish magazine which was covered in an article by The Epoch Times.com. The article was entitled, “Chief of Meteorologist Organization Castigates Climate Alarmists.” The WMO is not just any organization, it’s the organization that co-created the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC, of course, is the United Nation’s agency with respect to climate change (see link below for the full article).

Here’s some of the highlights of the article:

Taalas issued an “unprecedented rebuke to climate alarmists.”

Taalas said, “In parts of the globe, living conditions are becoming worse, but people have survived in harsh conditions…It’s not going to be the end of the world.”

“Taalas pointed out that climate extremists are selectively picking out facts from the IPCC reports to fit their narrative.” Taalas said that, “IPCC reports have been read in a similar way to the Bible: you try to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify your extreme views.”

Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace commented on Taalas’ remarks as follows: “The meteorologists are real scientists and probably fed up with Greta, Mann, Gore & AOC catastrophists. Good on him.”

 However, Taalas isn’t the only one speaking out lately against global warming; for example:

“Climate activists claim we face a global warming emergency that demands we replace dependable, inexpensive fossil fuels with so-called ‘green’ energy, such as wind and solar power. Not only would this starve society of the energy we need to survive. Real-world data demonstrate that there is no climate emergency! It is a manufactured crisis, created by vested interests – activists, scientists and crony capitalists – and adopted without question by opportunistic politicians, regulators and media pundits for their own interests.” – Paul Driessen

“The global climate scare – and policies resulting from it – is based on models that do not work.” – Dr. Jay Lehr and Tom Harris

Professor Ivor Giaever, a Nobel Laureate in physics, gave a speech in front of a group of other Nobel Laureates which was entitled “Global Warming Is Pseudoscience.”

People are even taking their frustration with global warming alarmists out through legal actions in the court system.

A physics professor in Australia was awarded $800,000 because he was unlawfully fired by his university because of his skeptical views on global warming.

The Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) dismissed a lawsuit by climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann against climatologist Dr. Tim Ball. In its landmark ruling, the court found that there was no evidence to support Dr. Mann’s science for global warming. It was Dr. Mann’s work which Al Gore used to start the whole global warming hysteria.

Then, there’s the media which has published various articles which undermine the global warming narrative, such as:

Daily Caller – “Math Error: Scientists Admit Mistakes Led To Alarming Results In Major Global Warming Study” – November 8, 2014 

Newsmax – “New Reports: There Is No Global Warming” – September 9, 2019

Daily Mail(UK) – “Exposed: How World Leaders Were Duped Into Investing Billions Over Manipulated Global Warming Data” – February 4, 2017

Investors’ Business Daily – “Don’t Tell Anyone, But We Just Had Two Years of Record-Breaking Global Cooling” – May 16, 2018

Outer Places – “Bundle Up: Scientists Predict Mini Ice Age Will Hit Earth In Five Years” – December 28, 2017

The Freedom Articles – “10 Prominent Scientists Refuting Manmade Global Warming” – January 13, 2016

Newsmax – “John Casey: The Sun Has Ended Global Warming” – September 9, 2019

Natural News – “Environmentalists Are At War With Life On Earth…Total Collapse of Ecosystem The Real Goal of Climate Propagandists” – January 10, 2019

Breibart – “Study: Global Warming Does Not Cause Hurricanes” – January 16, 2019

News Punch – “Scientists Find Earth Is Cooling, Not Warming; NASA predicts Mini Ice Age” – November 19, 2018

Gateway Pundit – “Top NASA Global Warming Scientist Walks Back Global Warming Claims” – February 14, 2019

Armstrong Economics – “Al Gore’s Global Warming Deliberate Fraud To Increase Governmental Power” – February 14, 2019

Humans Are Free – “The Great Global Warming Scandal” – February, 2019 (based on a British television documentary)

National Geographic – “Deep Bore Into Antarctica Finds Freezing Ice, Not Melting As Expected” – January 16, 2018

Mish Talk – “Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling” – January 29, 2019

New American – “UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Lies About Climate, Sea Level” – February 12, 2019

Zero Hedge – “U.N. Official Admits Global Warming Agenda Is Really About Destroying Capitalism” – February 3, 2017

Ice Age Now – “Most Important Glacier in Northern Hemisphere Growing Rapidly, NASA Study Shows – March 26, 2019

Zero Hedge – “Scientists Find Man-made Climate Change Doesn’t Exist In Practice” – July 12, 2019

Hal Turner – “NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming Caused By Changes in Earth’s Solar Orbit and Axial Tilt” – August 8, 2019

The global warming change agenda is driven by the United Nations and the former head of its climate agency admitted that the Paris Climate Accords were not about science but rather about politics. Yes, it’s all about the politics, just as Paul Driessen said. Of course, some people will always respond with a “he said, she said.” However, as Stuart Chase once astutely observed, “For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.”

 

Here’s the link to the article mentioned above:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chief-of-world-meteorological-organization-castigates-climate-alarmists_3073666.html

Here is a must-read from Armstrong Economics entitled, “Global Warming Is Undermined By New Discoveries.”  I’ll just give you a few of the highlights:

Scientists have discovered a massive, previously unknown, source of nitrogen that has profound implications for the whole global warming theory.

The findings were published in the prestigious Journal Science.

The new discovery alters the theory that man is causing global warming.

The article was written by Martin Armstrong.  Here’s the link to the complete article: