The biggest lie ever told is that something that is essential to all life is bad for the planet. What is it? Believe it or not, it’s CO2 – carbon dioxide.

This is not some misinterpretation.  This is not even faulty science.  This is an outright lie.  The lie of climate change/global warming that CO2 is a killer.

Carbon dioxide is a critical part of the photosynthesis process that creates life in plants. Without photosynthesis, no life would be possible on the planet. You can read up on this in any elementary science book. From the website whatisphotosynthesis.net comes this explanation of photosynthesis:

“… the process of photosynthesis which allows plants to convert light energy into usable food and remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and release oxygen into our environment.”

It’s a symbiotic exchange. Plants require the carbon dioxide that animals give off, while animals require the oxygen plants produce. Without photosynthesis from plants, the oxygen on our planet would run out and all human life would end. Then, the plants would die without the carbon dioxide that animals and humans produce.

A scientific study published in Nature Climate Change described the vital role of carbon dioxide in sustaining life on the planet.  They said that the planet is getting greener because of an increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.  Greener and healthier, you understand – because of carbon dioxide. So, here’s a real simple way to think of this:

Carbon dioxide = life

No carbon dioxide= no life

This issue hit the headlines recently because of a tweet by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a prominent supporter of the Green New Deal.  AOC said, “We either decarbonize & cut emissions, or we don’t & let people die.”  There’s the lie. Remember carbon dioxide = life. So, what does AOC want to do?  Exactly the opposite.  She wants no carbon dioxide.

Okay, so you may have found the science lesson interesting but what does any of this have to do with you, right? Well, there’s a presidential election in 2020 and many of the people who are in the running are also supporting the Green New Deal. So, obviously, they are okay with no carbon dioxide/no life.  Are you?

 

Epilogue

Out in a remote part of Elbert County, Georgia, there stands a massive monument with an alarming message.  The monument is popularly called The Georgia Guidestones.  Inscribed on the monument is someone’s vision of a different set of Ten Commandments.  The First Commandment is to “maintain humanity under 500 million in perpetual balance with nature.” Any guess as to how they are going to reduce the world population down from 7 billion to 500 million?

Well, Bill Gates does. At a TED conference presentation on reducing world population, Gates said that we have to reduce CO2 to zero. To zero. Remember, no carbon dioxide = no life. Gates even proposed a solution towards that end – vaccines, courtesy of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Just connect the dots. Green New Deal…Georgia Guidestones…and Bill Gates…  reduce world population by getting rid of CO2.

CO2, it’s absolutely essential for all life on the planet.  That’s a scientific fact. Yet, people like AOC and Bill Gates will try to tell you otherwise.  Sometimes the bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell.

 

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” – Delgado Domingos, environmental scientist

Advertisements

…well, apparently not Petteri Taalas, the head of the World Meteorologist Organization (WMO). Taalas gave an interview to a Finnish magazine which was covered in an article by The Epoch Times.com. The article was entitled, “Chief of Meteorologist Organization Castigates Climate Alarmists.” The WMO is not just any organization, it’s the organization that co-created the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC, of course, is the United Nation’s agency with respect to climate change (see link below for the full article).

Here’s some of the highlights of the article:

Taalas issued an “unprecedented rebuke to climate alarmists.”

Taalas said, “In parts of the globe, living conditions are becoming worse, but people have survived in harsh conditions…It’s not going to be the end of the world.”

“Taalas pointed out that climate extremists are selectively picking out facts from the IPCC reports to fit their narrative.” Taalas said that, “IPCC reports have been read in a similar way to the Bible: you try to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify your extreme views.”

Patrick Moore, the co-founder of Greenpeace commented on Taalas’ remarks as follows: “The meteorologists are real scientists and probably fed up with Greta, Mann, Gore & AOC catastrophists. Good on him.”

 However, Taalas isn’t the only one speaking out lately against global warming; for example:

“Climate activists claim we face a global warming emergency that demands we replace dependable, inexpensive fossil fuels with so-called ‘green’ energy, such as wind and solar power. Not only would this starve society of the energy we need to survive. Real-world data demonstrate that there is no climate emergency! It is a manufactured crisis, created by vested interests – activists, scientists and crony capitalists – and adopted without question by opportunistic politicians, regulators and media pundits for their own interests.” – Paul Driessen

“The global climate scare – and policies resulting from it – is based on models that do not work.” – Dr. Jay Lehr and Tom Harris

Professor Ivor Giaever, a Nobel Laureate in physics, gave a speech in front of a group of other Nobel Laureates which was entitled “Global Warming Is Pseudoscience.”

People are even taking their frustration with global warming alarmists out through legal actions in the court system.

A physics professor in Australia was awarded $800,000 because he was unlawfully fired by his university because of his skeptical views on global warming.

The Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) dismissed a lawsuit by climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann against climatologist Dr. Tim Ball. In its landmark ruling, the court found that there was no evidence to support Dr. Mann’s science for global warming. It was Dr. Mann’s work which Al Gore used to start the whole global warming hysteria.

Then, there’s the media which has published various articles which undermine the global warming narrative, such as:

Daily Caller – “Math Error: Scientists Admit Mistakes Led To Alarming Results In Major Global Warming Study” – November 8, 2014 

Newsmax – “New Reports: There Is No Global Warming” – September 9, 2019

Daily Mail(UK) – “Exposed: How World Leaders Were Duped Into Investing Billions Over Manipulated Global Warming Data” – February 4, 2017

Investors’ Business Daily – “Don’t Tell Anyone, But We Just Had Two Years of Record-Breaking Global Cooling” – May 16, 2018

Outer Places – “Bundle Up: Scientists Predict Mini Ice Age Will Hit Earth In Five Years” – December 28, 2017

The Freedom Articles – “10 Prominent Scientists Refuting Manmade Global Warming” – January 13, 2016

Newsmax – “John Casey: The Sun Has Ended Global Warming” – September 9, 2019

Natural News – “Environmentalists Are At War With Life On Earth…Total Collapse of Ecosystem The Real Goal of Climate Propagandists” – January 10, 2019

Breibart – “Study: Global Warming Does Not Cause Hurricanes” – January 16, 2019

News Punch – “Scientists Find Earth Is Cooling, Not Warming; NASA predicts Mini Ice Age” – November 19, 2018

Gateway Pundit – “Top NASA Global Warming Scientist Walks Back Global Warming Claims” – February 14, 2019

Armstrong Economics – “Al Gore’s Global Warming Deliberate Fraud To Increase Governmental Power” – February 14, 2019

Humans Are Free – “The Great Global Warming Scandal” – February, 2019 (based on a British television documentary)

National Geographic – “Deep Bore Into Antarctica Finds Freezing Ice, Not Melting As Expected” – January 16, 2018

Mish Talk – “Amidst Global Warming Hysteria, NASA Expects Global Cooling” – January 29, 2019

New American – “UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Lies About Climate, Sea Level” – February 12, 2019

Zero Hedge – “U.N. Official Admits Global Warming Agenda Is Really About Destroying Capitalism” – February 3, 2017

Ice Age Now – “Most Important Glacier in Northern Hemisphere Growing Rapidly, NASA Study Shows – March 26, 2019

Zero Hedge – “Scientists Find Man-made Climate Change Doesn’t Exist In Practice” – July 12, 2019

Hal Turner – “NASA: Climate Change and Global Warming Caused By Changes in Earth’s Solar Orbit and Axial Tilt” – August 8, 2019

The global warming change agenda is driven by the United Nations and the former head of its climate agency admitted that the Paris Climate Accords were not about science but rather about politics. Yes, it’s all about the politics, just as Paul Driessen said. Of course, some people will always respond with a “he said, she said.” However, as Stuart Chase once astutely observed, “For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.”

 

Here’s the link to the article mentioned above:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chief-of-world-meteorological-organization-castigates-climate-alarmists_3073666.html

Here is a must-read from Armstrong Economics entitled, “Global Warming Is Undermined By New Discoveries.”  I’ll just give you a few of the highlights:

Scientists have discovered a massive, previously unknown, source of nitrogen that has profound implications for the whole global warming theory.

The findings were published in the prestigious Journal Science.

The new discovery alters the theory that man is causing global warming.

The article was written by Martin Armstrong.  Here’s the link to the complete article:

Here’s an article that is worth reading from the Fee Foundation For Economic Freedom (see link below).  I’ll give you just the highlights of the scientific facts listed in the article:

  • Climate has always changed – always.
  • Temperature increases in the past was not caused by humans.
  • The arctic and antarctic are doing better than ever!
  • Polar bears and other species are not dying but flourishing!
  • Increases in carbon dioxide do not result in increases in temperature.
  • There has been no increase in the frequency or intensity of floods, hurricanes, tornados, wildfires, droughts or other extreme weather events.  Even the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported low confidence that global warming – manmade or not – was causing extreme weather events.

The article went on to say that, “These are some of the many climate facts that the media refuses to acknowledge, like the impending solar minimum that NASA has predicted for the next two solar cycles between 2021 and 2041, ushering in a period of global cooling like it did during the solar minimum of the 17th century.”

New Ice Age anyone?

The writer of the article is Vijay Jayaraj (from India).  Link- https://fee.org/articles/5-surprising-scientific-facts-about-earth-s-climate/

 

The planet just came out of a mini ice age in the 19thcentury so of course temperatures have gone up. Obviously, they couldn’t have gone much lower. Thank goodness that temperatures did go up or we would still be stuck in a mini ice age and holding frost fairs on the Thames River.

Nevertheless, the climate change hysteria continues to ratchet up. Recently, though, a number of people have been undercutting the global warming hypothesis. Here’s a short list:

 

The politics of global warming

  • Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former Chief of Staff and one of the authors of the Green New Deal, disclosed that the Green New Deal is a change-the-economy-thing. In an interview with the Washington Post, he said, “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all… we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” Comment:  So, it’s not really about the climate. Are you listening AOC?
  • Christiana Figueres, of the United Nations global warming agency, publicly admitted that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity, but rather to destroy capitalism. Comment: Investor’s Business Daily reported on Figueres’ statement with an article bearing this headline – ‘U.N. Official Reveals Reason Behind Warming Scare.’
  • John Holdren, Science Czar under President Obama – Headline from CNS News.com reads ‘White House Science Czar Says He Would Use Free Market to De-Develop the United States.’ Comment: Now you know where Figueres and Chakrabarti got their ideas about changing the economy from.
  • Noel Brown, of the United Nations Environment Program, warned in 1989 of a 10-year window of opportunity to solve global warming or entire nations could be wiped off the face of Earth by the year 2000. Of course, it never happened. Comment: Now you know where AOC got her 12 year end-of-the-world scenario from.

 

The science of global warming

  • Kate Marvel, a NASA climatologist, in an interview had this to say: “I’m not sure that climate change is an immediate threat to human existence.” Comment: Maybe, she better give AOC the “bad” news that we’re not going to all die in 12 years.
  • Ben Sauter, a global warming advocate, wrote a paper which was published in Nature Geoscience in which he admitted that the computer models used in global warming studies to predict future climate change were way off.  Comment: Can you spell C-L-I-M-A-T-E-G-A-T-E?
  • Nils-Axel Morner, did an interview with The New American entitled “UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Lies About Climate, Sea Level.” Comment: The IPCC’s own Dr. Madhav Khandekar also blew the whistle on the U.N.’s fake science, as I have reported in previous posts.
  • After a series of studies, scientists in Finland found glaring errors in the IPCC’s research on global temperatures. They found that there was practically no man-made climate change. This has since been corroborated by researchers at Kobe University in Japan whose findings were published in Science Daily.
  • A scientific study, based on NASA data, and published in Nature Climate Change reveals that rising carbon dioxide levels are having a tremendously positive impact on the re-greening of planet.  Comment: The life of the planet depends on high levels of CO2 and yet AOC wants to eliminate carbon dioxide! If we followed her advice, we probably would all die in 12 years.

 

Global warming in the courts

The Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) recently dismissed a lawsuit by climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann against climatologist Dr. Tim Ball. In its landmark ruling, the court found that there was no evidence to support Dr. Mann’s science for global warming. Comment: Of course, it was Mann’s research that was used by Al Gore in his famous “hockey stick” presentation. Try telling that to Al Gore now.

 

Epilogue

Referring to the Paris Climate Accord, Christiana Fuentes said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model (capitalism) that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”

So, the real objective of the global warming initiative is to destroy Western Civilization’s economy (capitalism) by regulating carbon emissions. This is all to accomplish a very totalitarian form of population control (eugenics). To understand the underlying ideology just see the Georgia Guidestones or read John Holdren’s book “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” which he co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich.

With respect to the United States, they want to introduce a socialist form of government which will lend itself to totalitarianism.  The Green New Deal is just the tip of the iceberg.  Here’s a flavor of what it would look like. No cars, no planes, no freedom of speech, no 2nd Amendment.  People would live almost exclusively in high-density population centers (for further reference you can read up on the U. N.’s Agenda 21). The country would have no borders and would, at some point, cease being a sovereign nation altogether.  The country would then be run by The United Nations which, in turn, would be controlled by the world’s elites. Welcome to 1984 courtesy of George Orwell.

 

“Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture.  The object of power is power.”  – George Orwell

 

 

 

 

 

A study by an international team of scientists, in coordination with NASA, has found that rising CO2 levels is having a tremendous positive impact on the global ecosystem. The study was published in Nature Climate Change and is based on satellite data provided by NASA.

Science has demonstrated over and over again that CO2 is the miracle molecule of life. As a recent article in Natural News says,The more CO2 we release into the atmosphere, the more nutrients are available for plants, and the more rapidly the Earth is re-greened.” Even NASA scientists have confirmed that carbon dioxide is greening the planet and NASA’s website has an article entitled,Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds.”

It will interesting to see which of the Democratic candidates seeking their party’s nomination for president in 2020 will have a platform centered around the Green New Deal, and which ones won’t. The science is now clear.  It’s mostly only the politicians that will continue to lie.

 

Epilogue

To date, the following prominent presidential hopefuls have endorsed the Green New Deal. That being the case, I predict that none of them will become president in 2020:

  • Cory Booker
  • Kamala Harris
  • Elizabeth Warren
  • Amy Klobuchar
  • Bernie Sanders
  • Robert O’Rourke
  • Pete Buttigieg
  • Kirstin Gillibrand

 

Global warming was supposed to be bad for the planet, but I’m here to tell you that global cooling is so much worse.  All the cold weather this past winter produced record snowfalls, especially across the Midwest.  When spring came, the snow melted and now we have an apocalypse of flooding.  The following article refers to it as “an agricultural disaster without equal in modern American history.”– see link https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-30/midwest-apocalypse-satellite-data-show-least-1-million-acres-us-farmland-devastated

Get ready for a disaster at the supermarket.

Of course, weather runs in cycles and we know from past cold weather eras, like the late 17thcentury, that cold weather can wreak havoc on the planting and harvesting of crops.  Never mind the loss of animal life which we are experiencing in record numbers across the Midwest and in Australia in particular.

The real key to understanding the whole global warming/cooling debate is this. Food can’t be grown when it’s cold but can when it’s warm.  If temperatures got real hot and the major ice floes melt and sea levels rise, that would be a problem for populations along coastlines.  However, the planet would survive.

Note: We all wouldn’t perish in 12 years even if CO2 levels increased dramatically. That is, CO2 is good the planet, not bad. It’s a scientific fact that we need to have CO2, and lots of it, to exist on this planet despite what Al Gore thinks.

However, with cooling, things could get really bad especially in the Northern Hemisphere. There’s a reason why the Northern Hemisphere was not populated during some ancient periods (ice ages). To survive, the northern populations, which constitute 90% of the world population, would all have to move way south.  Good luck with seven billion people trying to survive on one-third of the planet’s land mass and with very little in the way of food production because food is primarily grown in the Northern Hemisphere.

Here’s the rub.  The media isn’t reporting on the implications of our weather problems.  That’s because they might have to explain why cold weather is far worse for us than warm weather.  Fancy that. However, when people wake up to the reality of major increases in food prices and/or empty shelves in the supermarket, there will be hell to pay. Better get the parkas out as the cold weather isn’t likely to end anytime soon.

 

Epilogue

A study published in Nature Climate Change looked at the four major warming periods of the last 5,000 years. Of the four, the coolest one was for the period recently ended in 1980. in fact, the Minoan warm period approximately 3,500 years ago was 4°C warmer than today. None of the four warm periods were associated with failing ecosystems despite being warmer than the 20th century.  So much for the threat of global warming.

Life is all about cycles. When the planet warms up, life flourishes.  When it gets cold, crops don’t grow and survival is a struggle. Life is totally dependent on the sun.

Over the last 400,000 years, the earth has been mostly in a cooling phase.  About every 100,000 to 125,000 years there is a brief warming phase. The current warming phase began approximately 12,500 years ago.

Even during the last 12,500 years, there have been a number of cold periods.  For example, there was a cold period that lasted for about 300 years that roughly fits with the time frame of the Dark Ages. Then, around 1400 AD, the world experienced a mini ice-age which lasted approximately 400 years. So, for the last 1,400 years, half of that time it was warm and half the time it was cold.

So, guess what?  It has been warm for a while so at some point we will have another cold period.  It’s only a question of when, and not if. The current warming period has lasted 12,500 years and warming periods historically have been quite brief. Therefore, this one could end at any time.  Further, sunspot activity always tracks with the weather cycles.  A high number of sunspots equates to warm weather and a low number relates to cold weather…and we haven’t had any sunspots for the last 32 days. We are entering what scientists refer to as a Grand Solar Minimum.  The sun goes quiet and the weather gets cold.  Real cold, even colder than what it has been this winter.  Even NASA has said that the Grand Solar Minimum is coming soon.

Some scientists have made a big deal about rising CO2 levels because of man-made activity. Yet, civilization has been at its peak during this period.  As reported in a recent scientific study, the planet is actually getting greener.  And why not, CO2 is required in the cycle between humans and plant life. It’s a symbiotic exchange, CO2 for oxygen. Besides, with the weather being cold, CO2 concerns are irrelevant anyway.  In fact, global warming science has become irrelevant…just check outdoors and see for yourself.

 

Epilogue

paper authored by global warming advocate Ben Sauter and published in Nature Geoscience admitted that the computer models used in global warming studies to predict future climate change were way off.  Another study had similar errors. As reported in the San Diego Union-Tribune, Ralph Keeling, a scientist with the Scripps Institute of Oceanography said, Our error margins are too big now to really weigh in on the precise amount of warming that’s going on in the ocean. We really muffed the error margins.”

Yet, global warming still is taken seriously in certain circles, including American politics where it has become part of the platform of certain candidates for president in 2020. At what point do they finally have to concede on this point? I assume that this will only happen after the election when there are serious shortages of food on the grocery shelves, sort of like George H. W. Bush’s, “Read my lips, no new taxes.” We all know how well that one turned out.

 

“Unfortunately, the IPCC (United Nations) climate change documents do not provide an objective assessment of the earth’s temperature trends and associated climate change.” – Dr. Madhav Khandekar, environmental scientist

 

 

Some people still believe in the global warming fiction, as it’s endlessly promoted by the media. There is seemingly no scientific evidence that you can present them that will change their minds.

For example, something called the Grand Solar Minimum is now in the forefront of the global warming debate. Dr. Tony Phillips of NASA recently stated that,The sun is entering one of the deepest Solar Minima of the Space Age.” The takeaway, as reported by Zero Hedge, is that, “The lack of sunspots on our sun could bring about record cold temperatures, and perhaps even a mini ice age.”  All you have to do to confirm this is to go outside these days.  There’s record cold temperatures everywhere.  You would think that by NASA saying this some people might finally wake up – but, apparently not.

Just check out the following videos for other interesting takes on the subject:

 

The question that I pose is why is this truth being hidden from the public?

As I’ve posted before, the United Nations has publicly admitted that what they are really trying to do is to destroy capitalism (rather than saving the planet from global warming). Thus, all the scare tactics.  For example, AOC has stated that the world will end in twelve years because of global warming if we don’t implement her Green New Deal.  Do you believe her? I, for one, believe that if the world does end it will be because we starved to death from the effects of the planet turning into an ice ball – or perhaps snow ball, as over three feet of snow fell the other day in Flagstaff, Az.

 

What’s next in the timeline?

What you need to monitor closely is this. Food prices. They will be going up sharply as the cold weather is already having a devastating effect on crops world-wide. Of course, regardless of the circumstances, everything will be blamed on global warming. It’s sort of like economics.  The government will never tell you that we’re going into a recession but will finally let you know once you’re already in a recession and it’s painfully obvious to everyone. In this case, however, the elites will never give up on their global warming agenda because it’s a central part of their game plan.  That is, global warming = carbon taxes = destroy capitalism = eliminate personal freedoms and the middle class = rule the world.

 

What else do you need to know?

Nothing else, really.

 

Epilogue

Talking about this is just making my brain numb (no not from the cold). So, I think I’ll just watch the latest Ice Age movie entitled Ice Age: Collision Course.  Maybe, there’s a funny side to all of this.

 

 

 

 

 

 

People want to know: If there is no threat of global warming, why do they keep promoting it?  Fair question.

Well, first of all, there are trillions of dollars to be made off of selling carbon credits.  Thank you Al Gore. As they always say, follow the money.  Then there is power.  After all, what do the richest people in the world want…it’s power.  If you control the production of carbon, which is essential to all life-processes, you control all life.  Not just all governments you understand, but all life.  Remember the Georgia Guidestones.

The United Nations heads up the world-wide effort to promote global warming through the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. As reported by Zero Hedge, Christiana Figueres, the then head of that U.N. global warming agency, said that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity… but rather to destroy capitalism.

Why would capitalism be a threat and to who?  Well, the progress in Western Civilization since the Industrial Revolution was made largely possible by capitalism, a system which has the following features:

  • Right of private property
  • Free markets driven by the consumer (no government intervention)
  • Profit incentives (entrepreneurship/innovation)
  • Freedom of enterprise (choice of career)

Capitalism equates with freedom and individual rights, as you can clearly see from the list above.  So, exactly who would feel threatened by a capitalistic system?  Well, anyone who  wanted to rule the world. So, if you controlled all carbon emissions it would make it possible to destroy capitalism, thereby making it possible to rule the world (through socialism, fascism or communism).  You see, saving the world is an euphemism for ruling the world.  Just ask Christiana Figueres.

 

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”  – Christiana Figueres