Socialism is much in the news these days. Many of our elected officials are endorsing socialistic ideas such as the Green New Deal. However, socialism runs counter to the ideals of the American Revolution and the culture that ensued for well over 200 years. So, why now?

America can be defined as the “people’s government” as can be seen in the Preamble to the United States Constitution which starts with the words “We the People.” Abraham Lincoln, in his Gettysburg Address, elaborated on that concept with the phrase “Government of the people, by the people, for the people.” So, the American way is one of self-government, with the government being merely an extension of the people.

In socialism, ultimate power vests in the State, and an amorphous State at that. They tell the citizens what rights they can and cannot have. Whereas, the Constitution grants citizens “inalienable rights” which cannot be taken away by the government. Without the Constitution, there would be no protection for minority rights.

One of the appeals of socialism is that it appears that everything is free. I said “appears.” The proponents of the Green New Deal when asked how they were going to pay for the trillions of dollars that would be required to fund their programs said that the government should just print more money. Well, they obviously don’t understand basic economic reality or they think that the public is stupid enough to believe them, take your choice. Printing money is not nearly the same as paying for it. That is, the only money that the government has to pay its bills comes from the tax revenues that it collects.

Now, the why. Changes in political systems are rarely, if ever, about the political system itself.  So, socialism is just an excuse to change our form of government. It’s all about power. As James Carville, a top Democratic Party political strategist, said, “What we need is power! Do you understand? …But look, if no one’s persuadable, then let’s just have the revolution.” Is it possible that Carville views himself as the Che Guevara of the New American Revolution?


“I’m seeing what socialism’s like. It’s not only not free. It doesn’t freakin’ work.” – Chris Matthews, former MSNBC news commentator









The Democratic Party used to represent the underdog, the little guy and those with little to no representation, especially minorities.  What happened?

Sure, the Party still arguably represents poor people although even though that may now be in doubt.  Certainly, they are still the party of “free stuff.” They still espouse plenty of social programs, although even that has taken a different fork in the road. Today, the biggest social programs being proposed have nothing to do with providing an umbrella to support the disadvantaged, and certainly not the homeless or veterans. All the talk now is about the Green New Deal and spending trillions of dollars that we don’t have on radically transforming (socially reengineering) the country.  Yet, they don’t want to spend even a small fraction of that to do something about the sh**hole that places like Baltimore have become or cleaning up all the poop on the streets of San Francisco, just to name a few of the major problems that have hit the headlines recently.

Here’s the question that a lot of people are asking: What happened to the people of color amongst the Party’s 2020 presidential candidates?  A recent headline in The New American reads “The Debate Stage: Democrats Blame Their Voters For Their White Presidential Candidates.” The problem with that take is that no one has voted yet.  This is strictly something that is internal to the Party itself. Just ask Andrew Yang or Tulsi Gabbard if the Party’s rules are biased against people of color? You won’t need to ask Democratic Representative Barbara Lee, though. She has publicly said that “the Democratic National Committee’s rules for determining who can participate in its presidential debates is systematically discriminatory against people of color.” Even prominent people of color in the Democratic Party, such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib, did not endorse a person of color, and not even a woman for that matter. Don’t you have to walk the walk if you’re going to talk the talk?

So, how have we gotten to this point? Where did the old Democratic Party go?  Well for starters, the Party no longer truly represents blue-collar workers as so many of those jobs were shipped overseas. As for Blacks and Hispanics, they have been displaced in the party hierarchy by illegal immigrants. Sanctuary cities can spend millions protecting illegal immigrants without much of a thought to its citizens, particularly Blacks and Hispanics.  It’s really quite ironic since most of the illegal immigrants, themselves, are Hispanic.  As a result, many Blacks and Hispanics are leaving the Democratic Party because they are smart enough to realize that the Democratic Party is simply pandering to them to get their votes.  So, the old core constituency of the party is slowly dissipating.

It was Gregory Meeks of the Black Caucus who spilled the beans when he brought the fight into the open by publicly calling out certain fellow Democrats for targeting the congressional seats of people of color in the upcoming 2020 elections. Then there is civil rights activist Bob Woodson who said that Elizabeth Warren was using racism as a shield to avoid talking about the real problems in the Black community. Candace Owens, for one, would certainly agree (see below).

You may not be old enough to remember what the old Democratic Party was like, but I do. What it has changed into is completely unrecognizable from what I recall. Today, the power behind the throne of the Democratic Party is the white liberal elites (according to none other than the aforementioned Gregory Meeks). It’s no longer about the little guy, it’s about Silicon Valley and Hollywood, it’s about the media companies, and ultimately it’s all about globalism. You and I, we don’t have a voice in the Democratic Party – not anymore.


“You know that white supremacy and white nationalism rank no where near the top of the issues that is facing Black America… It is an attempt to make the election all about race…The things that are actually harming Black America – #1 father absence #2 the education system and the illiteracy rate… White supremacy and white nationalism, if I had to make a list again of 100 things, would not be on it. This hearing, in my opinion, is a farce.  And it’s ironic that you’re sitting here and having three Caucasian people testify and tell you what their expertise is. You want to know what my expertise are – Black and American.”  – Candace Owens, testifying before Congress

California is ablaze today, but the politicians are incendiary.  Even AOC chimed in saying, “This is what climate change looks like.” There are a couple of problems with AOC’s statement.

First and foremost, there has been no climate change in California.  The summer was, in fact, quite pleasant.  The fires themselves were directly or indirectly man-made.  Light a fire and blame it on climate change.  Nice. Finally, the fires are almost impossible to control because of decades of environmental mismanagement by the State of California.

AOC went on to say that things will only get worse unless we reduce carbon emissions by half in the next ten years. What happened to us all dying in 12 years unless carbon emissions are reduced to zero?  Seems like she’s seriously backtracking here.  Furthermore, the U.S. has actually been reducing emissions, unlike the two serious polluters in the world, China and India, where carbon emissions are getting worse every year. Maybe, AOC and Greta Thunberg should consider taking their dog and pony show to China instead, where it might actually do some good.

Perhaps, however, they should just stop propagating their false claims of climate change altogether. After all, AOC’s former chief-of-staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, has publicly admitted that the Green New Deal was not primarily about the environment; that it was about changing Western Civilization’s economic system. Guess who else agrees with him- the United Nations.  Referring to the Paris Climate Accord, Christiana Fuentes, former head of the United Nations global warming agency, said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model (capitalism) that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”  



The world isn’t going to be devastated in 12 years. Miami is not going to disappear in a few years due to rising sea levels (as AOC has stated) and brush fires is a problem that man has created, and can therefore fix himself. The kicker is that CO2 is actually good for the planet because plants/crops need it to grow. That’s a scientific fact. Besides, the average global temperature is currently much lower than it’s been for most of the last 600 million years. 

Some of the environmental problems that the world has experienced in the last 50 years or so were indeed man-made. Many of them, however, were created intentionally to promote a political agenda. That is, you create a problem and then when people demand a solution, you give them one, something that fits your ideology and goals. As environmental scientist Delgado Domingos said, “The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control …Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense.” 

AOC Unveiled


AOC is a congresswoman, a social media darling and the face of the socialist movement in America. Recently, she came out and supported Bernie Sanders and made a personal appearance at his campaign rally. So, the big question is why Bernie?  Why an old, white man and not a woman of color? What’s the strategy?

Of course, politics is rarely what it appears to be to the unwashed masses. As a senior House Democratic aide said about AOC, “She’s only a woman of color when it’s convenient.” To make matters worse, the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is at odds with AOC for targeting minority lawmakers.

The real strategizing in politics is about the backroom deals that create political alliances, even between rivals.  However, Bernie Sanders is dying, politically speaking that is.  He’s in third behind Biden and Warren.  Further, his age and his medical condition don’t help matters any.  So, why would AOC be interested in Bernie? Why? What’s in it for her?

To begin with, AOC considers herself as representing working-class people.  The problem is that her actions in Congress belie that, to wit:

  • She spearheaded an effort to keep Amazon from moving their offices to her home congressional district. As a result, her congressional district lost thousands of jobs that would have benefited the working class there. 
  • She supported a higher minimum wage which Harvard and Stanford studies have proved that a higher minimum wage hurts the very people that it was intended to help. 
  • Ditto rent controls.

So, if her public profile of representing the working-class is a smokescreen, who does she really represent?  Well, the CBC let the cat out of the proverbial bag when they disclosed that AOC was beholden to the white, liberal elite.  You see, in politics, it’s all about money and power. Politicians can get the power if they can get the money, as political campaigns are extremely expensive. The old adage is still true: just follow the money trail.

AOC’s campaign manager in her 2016 election and her first chief-of-staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, helped to form the far-left Justice Democrats. AOC ran on the Justice Democrats’ platform, with their financial backing. You didn’t think that AOC came up with the Green New Deal did you? AOC is simply the cover girl with the Wizard of Oz lurking behind the curtain.  Chakrabarti’s politics is not about winning elections per se.  He has a much grander political vision. To be more precise, it’s about revolution – to fundamentally transform the country. The goal is have the government control all facets of the social, economic and financial lifeblood of the nation.

And, of course, the rabbit hole goes much deeper than Chakrabarti.

So, what does any of this have to do with AOC’s endorsement of Bernie Sanders? Well, it’s a political power play. The target is Elizabeth Warren.  Bernie is just a convenient pawn in the chess game. Everyone is playing 3-D chess.  Everyone except AOC, that is. She’s on a whole other level (4-D).  Warren is the presumptive Democratic presidential candidate and AOC wants a seat at the Warren table.  She wants to be the power behind the throne.

So, the talking heads, no doubt, will fill up the airspace with all sorts of pablum. They will wax elegantly about why Bernie and AOC make good sense. However, it will be just an attempt to obscure the fact that there’s another agenda at play behind the scenes.  It’s an agenda that you were never meant to find out about… but, of course, now you know.


Up until very recently, very few people knew who Tulsi Gabbard was.  After the last Democratic debate, that has no doubt changed. The media can no longer ignore her and the DNC will have trouble excluding her (again) from future debates.

What changed? Well, Gabbard rocked the latest Democratic debate by telling the American people the awful truth about our nation’s military interventionism abroad.  As a result, Gabbard was attacked by CNN, the New York Times and Hillary Clinton.  Hillary accused her of being a Russian agent.  The pushback from Gabbard was stunning.  Gabbard responded to Hillary saying,  “You, the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.”

I know you’re probably asking how this is different from any other toe–to-toe between two politicians. The answer is that Gabbard is an anti-war candidate who does not support the Green New Deal, making her a pariah within her own party.  Virtually all of the other Democratic presidential candidates support endless wars abroad (and the Green New Deal).

Here’s what this all means…

Those who support endless wars are agents of the Deep State. So, for example, all the candidates other than Gabbard are for protecting the Syrian border but are against guarding the U.S. border.  Does that make any sense to you? Of course not.  All of the other candidates are for the U.S. bankrupting itself in order to be the world’s policeman while ignoring the needs of its own citizens; the very people who elected them to office in the first place.  

In politics, you have to ask this question: Who benefits? Well, for starters, the U.S. doesn’t benefit fighting a war in the Middle East. It’s simply not in our national interest. That’s been proven through two Gulf Wars (in Iraq) and one in Afghanistan.  Besides, the U.S. is now energy self-sufficient and doesn’t have to rely on Middle Eastern oil so that excuse cannot be used anymore.

To be clear, this issue of endless wars is not a political issue (Democrats vs. Republicans) as there are plenty of Republicans who support endless wars (e.g. John Bolton) who are also agents of the Deep State.  The Deep State controls both parties…but they don’t control Tulsi Gabbard.  The Tulsi Gabbard Effect will be on full display from now on.  The Deep State, and its Mockingbird Media, will not want to discuss endless wars but it may be unavoidable now that Gabbard is a serious candidate who can no longer be ignored.  

Besides, I was getting tired of the candidates continually trying to explain why socialism would be good for America.  Now we have a real race – Hillary vs. Tulsi.  The “endless wars” establishment vs. the anti-war candidate. So much fuss over just a couple of thousand troops in Syria, but now you know what the real issue is (war vs. no war).  It’s a dirty little secret that the establishment has been trying to obscure…but, of course, now you know.

“That is why the neocon/neolib warmongers will do anything to stop me.”   -Tulsi Gabbard

After 2020



People have asked me what our country would look like if a democrat were to be elected president in 2020. Nobody knows for sure, however, based on what candidates have promised publicly, including the Green New Deal, I would have to say that it would look something like this:

Traditional forms of energy (gas, oil and nuclear) will be eliminated. As Joe Biden said, “ I guarantee you, we are going to end fossil fuel.”

Combustion engines will be banned. No cars, no airplanes (except private jets for the elite).

Gun confiscation (except for private security for the elites).

Restrictions on free speech, including government control of the internet.

Open borders; no ICE or DHS.

Capitalism will be replaced by socialism.  The economics of the corporate, globalist state will not include free markets.  The State will control everything. As Rashida Tliab said, “We need a political revolution” to “completely transform” America.

Healthcare for all, including illegal aliens.  Free healthcare for life for children of illegal aliens.

Taxes will go up…and up, especially for the Middle Class. The wealthy needn’t worry too much because their existing wealth is virtually tax-proof because of non-profits, foundations and non-taxable trusts. Besides, they make large contributions to the campaigns of the congressmen who write the tax code.

Universal Basic Income – including for people who don’t want to work.

Religious people will be discriminated against.

Climate change will be deemed to be a National Emergency.


Of course, that’s far from a complete list. For example, American cities will increasingly resemble San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City. People from Third World countries will continue to migrate to this country, and in much larger numbers.  However, those of any financial means will increasingly leave the country. Within a generation or two, there will be no middle class; only the elites and a servant class. America, itself, would look like a Third World nation, incapable of taking care of the hordes of poor, mostly uneducated people who would then live here.

As for the 2020 election, you need to understand that Trump is simply a bogeyman. The original game plan was for Hillary to succeed Obama. That didn’t happen, of course. The new game plan is to convince the public that they need to move on from Trump so that the country can then be radically transformed. That’s how political revolutions are born.


The planet just came out of a mini ice age in the 19thcentury so of course temperatures have gone up. Obviously, they couldn’t have gone much lower. Thank goodness that temperatures did go up or we would still be stuck in a mini ice age and holding frost fairs on the Thames River.

Nevertheless, the climate change hysteria continues to ratchet up. Recently, though, a number of people have been undercutting the global warming hypothesis. Here’s a short list:


The politics of global warming

  • Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former Chief of Staff and one of the authors of the Green New Deal, disclosed that the Green New Deal is a change-the-economy-thing. In an interview with the Washington Post, he said, “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all… we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” Comment:  So, it’s not really about the climate. Are you listening AOC?
  • Christiana Figueres, of the United Nations global warming agency, publicly admitted that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity, but rather to destroy capitalism. Comment: Investor’s Business Daily reported on Figueres’ statement with an article bearing this headline – ‘U.N. Official Reveals Reason Behind Warming Scare.’
  • John Holdren, Science Czar under President Obama – Headline from CNS reads ‘White House Science Czar Says He Would Use Free Market to De-Develop the United States.’ Comment: Now you know where Figueres and Chakrabarti got their ideas about changing the economy from.
  • Noel Brown, of the United Nations Environment Program, warned in 1989 of a 10-year window of opportunity to solve global warming or entire nations could be wiped off the face of Earth by the year 2000. Of course, it never happened. Comment: Now you know where AOC got her 12 year end-of-the-world scenario from.


The science of global warming

  • Kate Marvel, a NASA climatologist, in an interview had this to say: “I’m not sure that climate change is an immediate threat to human existence.” Comment: Maybe, she better give AOC the “bad” news that we’re not going to all die in 12 years.
  • Ben Sauter, a global warming advocate, wrote a paper which was published in Nature Geoscience in which he admitted that the computer models used in global warming studies to predict future climate change were way off.  Comment: Can you spell C-L-I-M-A-T-E-G-A-T-E?
  • Nils-Axel Morner, did an interview with The New American entitled “UN IPCC Scientist Blows Whistle on Lies About Climate, Sea Level.” Comment: The IPCC’s own Dr. Madhav Khandekar also blew the whistle on the U.N.’s fake science, as I have reported in previous posts.
  • After a series of studies, scientists in Finland found glaring errors in the IPCC’s research on global temperatures. They found that there was practically no man-made climate change. This has since been corroborated by researchers at Kobe University in Japan whose findings were published in Science Daily.
  • A scientific study, based on NASA data, and published in Nature Climate Change reveals that rising carbon dioxide levels are having a tremendously positive impact on the re-greening of planet.  Comment: The life of the planet depends on high levels of CO2 and yet AOC wants to eliminate carbon dioxide! If we followed her advice, we probably would all die in 12 years.


Global warming in the courts

The Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) recently dismissed a lawsuit by climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann against climatologist Dr. Tim Ball. In its landmark ruling, the court found that there was no evidence to support Dr. Mann’s science for global warming. Comment: Of course, it was Mann’s research that was used by Al Gore in his famous “hockey stick” presentation. Try telling that to Al Gore now.



Referring to the Paris Climate Accord, Christiana Fuentes said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model (capitalism) that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”

So, the real objective of the global warming initiative is to destroy Western Civilization’s economy (capitalism) by regulating carbon emissions. This is all to accomplish a very totalitarian form of population control (eugenics). To understand the underlying ideology just see the Georgia Guidestones or read John Holdren’s book “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” which he co-authored with Paul and Anne Ehrlich.

With respect to the United States, they want to introduce a socialist form of government which will lend itself to totalitarianism.  The Green New Deal is just the tip of the iceberg.  Here’s a flavor of what it would look like. No cars, no planes, no freedom of speech, no 2nd Amendment.  People would live almost exclusively in high-density population centers (for further reference you can read up on the U. N.’s Agenda 21). The country would have no borders and would, at some point, cease being a sovereign nation altogether.  The country would then be run by The United Nations which, in turn, would be controlled by the world’s elites. Welcome to 1984 courtesy of George Orwell.


“Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture.  The object of power is power.”  – George Orwell






No one wants to immigrate to a socialist country according to Rachel Campos-Duffy.  So, why is what Duffy says important?  Perhaps, here’s why.

Duffy is Hispanic. Her grandparents immigrated from Mexico. She has a degree in Economics and a masters degree in International Affairs.  Further, she understands what any student of economics understands, that true capitalism is the driver of world prosperity.  Everyone understands, except AOC that is.

More from Duffy:

 “The desperate people of Central America who come to our border are not actually refugees. They are economic migrants. They are lining up to come to our country because of our free enterprise system…They come here for capitalism.  They are fleeing socialism…It is purely ironic that AOC, a Latina, is the leader of America’s socialist movement because no one knows better than Hispanics that these ideas do not work…Socialism leads to desperation.  It leads to indignities.  It leads to hunger and it leads to death.  You would know that if there wasn’t a blackout in your textbooks about all the atrocities done in the name of socialism.” – from a speech before Young America’s Foundation

Aye, the textbooks. There’s the rub. One need only read the writings of Karl Marx or Vladimir Lenin to understand where socialism leads.  However, you will never read about those things in a textbook and you will almost never hear a professor talk about such things in any college, unless, of course, they want to be fired.

So, why is AOC promoting the Green New Deal when she has a degree in economics and why can’t she explain to those who are asking how this program works, economically speaking. The answer is really quite simple: because AOC knows that this program would be an economic disaster for the country (and she doesn’t care because she is a socialist).

Yet, AOC and most of the Democratic candidates for the 2020 Democratic nomination tout this program. Why?  Again, the answer is really simple.  It’s all about politics.  Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former Chief of Staff and one of the purported authors of the Green New Deal, told us all as to “the why.” In an interview with the Washington Post he said,“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all… we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.”

Yes, a change-the-entire-economy thing. Christiana Figueres, of the United Nations global warming agency, put it slightly differently when she publicly admitted that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity, but rather to destroy capitalism. If you read Karl Marx, you’ll understand why that is absolutely true.

Socialism is a means to an end.  Get rid of capitalism and replace it with socialism, where all power rests with the State.  Once you have the power, getting rid of freedom is a mere formality….and that’s what Duffy knows and what you should also be aware of. It’s the socialists dirty little secret that you were not supposed to know about, but, of course, now you know.


“The goal of socialism is communism.”  – Vladimir Lenin





Some of you have asked who are the liberal elites mentioned in my last post The Man Behind The Curtain. This issue came up when Gregory Meeks, chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, got into a Twitter war with AOC and later called her a puppet who was controlled by the liberal elites.

Well, the liberal elites are none other than the Deep State. Saikat Chakrabarti, the man behind the curtain, should actually be thought of as the “woman behind the curtain.”  By that, I mean that Chakrabarti’s wife, Kamilka Malwatte, is the actual connection to the Deep State as she has worked for Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, the most powerful law firm in the world.

This is a glimpse inside the hidden world of politics, the world behind the curtain. The world that you have never been exposed to, perhaps until now. And you probably thought that AOC and/or Chakrabarti authored the Green New Deal.


Gradually, we’re beginning to learn more and more about the man who run’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) political career.  He is one Saikat Chakrabarti. Now that he’s openly taken on Nancy Pelosi, he will be more and more in the spotlight and his comments will be dissected by political commentators to try and understand the ideology that drives AOC’s political positions.

Chakrabarti is one of the loudest political voices in Washington with respect to climate change.  According to the Washington Post, Chakrabarti has commented that, “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all… we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” Say what!? Yes, notwithstanding what AOC says about everyone dying in ten years, climate change’s focus isn’t the environment, it’s about implementing socialism. More about where that idea came from later.

You need to understand that the Green New Deal is a strategy to win elections. As reported by the Washington Post, Chakrabarti explained that strategy thusly: “The whole theory of change for the current Democratic Party is that to win this country we need to tack to the hypothetical middle. What I think that means is, you don’t take unnecessary risks, which translates to: You don’t really do anything. Whereas we’ve got a completely different theory of change, which is: You do the biggest, most badass thing you possibly can — and that’s going to excite people, and then they’re going to go vote.” There you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. Tell people something different, something exciting in order to get them to come out and vote for you. It doesn’t matter if it isn’t true. Political offices are treated as a commodity and the Green New Deal is the marketing strategy to sell that product.

Winning elections is only the first step, however. According to Tom Donohue, CEO the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Green New Deal is really about giving government unprecedented power over people’s lives (as reported by the Daily Wire). In a way, nothing would change.  That is, we would still be controlled by certain unelected elites who would remain faceless behind the Chakrabarti curtain. Socialism would simply be the Trojan Horse.

The infighting in the Democratic Party seems to be escalating, however, since the far left is not “tacking to the middle.” Instead, they are polarizing the party.  Recently, Chakrabarti has decided to target moderate Democrats, particularly those from the Congressional Black Caucus, in the 2020 congressional elections and replace them with people who are far left. Despite Chakrabarti targeting people of color, AOC has accused Nancy Pelosi of being a racist and Chakrabarti tweeted that the moderate Democrats should be renamed The New Southern Democrats. “They certainly seem hell bent to do to black and brown people today what the old Southern Democrats did [during] the 40s.” Funny, but it’s kind of hard calling someone a racist when you are one yourself.

The racially-charged rift in Congress does drop the curtain, though, if ever so slightly. Gregory Meeks, chairman of the Black Caucus, has fired back that Chakrabarti’s group is funded by liberal white elites. Strange how you’ve never heard this before. The media only gives us AOC this and AOC that. There are memes about this former bartender who has been in office for only a little over six months and who knows little to nothing about how government should be run. However, they never tell us about the real powers that be, about the man(elites) behind the curtain…and you probably thought that you were living in a democracy.



“The United Nations heads up the world-wide effort to promote global warming through the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. As reported by Zero Hedge, Christiana Figueres, the then head of that U.N. global warming agency, said that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity… but rather to destroy capitalism.” – The Ethical, The Politics of Global Warming.  Figueres went on to say that, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.” That’s the game plan.  Take out capitalism and replace it with socialism…and scare the hell out of everybody by saying that it’s the end of the world unless we change. It’s a dirty little secret that you weren’t supposed to know about…but, of course, now you know.