I like to compare politicians to lunatics.  How else can you explain the loony things they do and say.  Case-in-point are these headlines from the news:

 

Headline:                                                                                                                Another Gaffe: Joe Biden Says ‘We Choose Truth Over Facts’

Comment:                                                                                                                       All politicians are loony, but at least Joe is entertaining.

 

Headline:                                                                                                                    Left-Wing Correspondent Thinks Biden’s Brain Will Plague Him Like Hillary’s Emails

Comment:                                                                                                                      Did anyone ask the correspondent if he was supporting one of the other presidential candidates and that his article, therefore, was just a political hit piece?

Comment: It is true, though, that poor Joe just can’t remember his war stories.

 

Headline:                                                                                                                Actress Debra Messing Promotes Message That Says Black Trump Support Is ‘Mental Illness’

Comment:                                                                                                                       The only thing worse than loony politicians is totally insane actors.  In this case, terribly racist as well.

 

Headline:                                                                                                                       Beto Admits That He Will Forcefully Confiscate Firearms If He’s Elected President

Comment:                                                                                                                 Who does he think he is? Lenin?

 

And that’s all the news that’s unfit to print.  Stay tuned for the Looney Tunes show which follows immediately.

 

The Deep State, the Illuminati, the elites and the 1%.  Different faces of the same Hydra.  They infect all social institutions in search of more power, although I’m not sure that there’s much more for them to possess.  In this vein, you might enjoy an article by Charles Hugh Smith posted on Of Two Minds.com.  Here’s the link to the full article: http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2019/07/our-ruling-elites-have-no-idea-how-much.html

In this country, the elites control both political parties.  These days, when they pose as Democrats they generally pretend to be socialists and when they pose as Republicans they generally pretend to be capitalists.  The result is an ideological food fight which is meant to distract as well as divide and conquer.

As we choose sides during this process of polarization, we actually hasten our own demise. Case-in-point is all the name calling over perceived racism.  I can tell you from my own experience that, while racism is a problem, there is actually less racism in this country than in any other country that I know of (and I’ve lived in or visited quite a few).

For example, Japan, a country which I generally admire, is terribly racist.  One of the more interesting side-effects of their racism has been their ability to maintain their ancient traditions (which are better than a vast majority of countries around the world).  They value their traditions above diversity. In fact, they abhor diversity because, by its very nature, it undermines traditions.  So, I give the Japanese a pass on their racism because I feel that they have a right to decide what kind of society that they want to have, even if it excludes me (which it did).

There’s value in maintaining one’s traditions ala the Japanese. In a country like ours (a nation of immigrants), you can’t be all things to all people.  That’s why, in the past, it was so important for new immigrants to quickly assimilate.  Today, however, everyone wants to live in their own ethnic communities and keep their ethnic cultural values.  That quickly becomes a problem with respect to languages taught in school and spoken in the community.  For example, I went into a McDonald’s Restaurant near downtown Los Angeles and the menu was in a variety of languages, although English wasn’t one of them. Worse, nobody spoke English either. I might as well have been in a foreign country.  Actually, in many foreign countries, you can generally find people who speak English although that wasn’t the case right here in America.

When immigrants isolate themselves by not assimilating, the inevitable result is that the country is no longer identifiable by its culture. When you have separate borders within a country (e.g. sanctuary cities), the country no longer has one common border. Bottom line: When you do not have one tradition that everyone observes and when you don’t have one common border you cease to function as a country…but, of course, that was the general idea all along, now wasn’t it?

 

 “We are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America.”  – President Barack Obama

P.S. If only that were true.

 

 

Gradually, we’re beginning to learn more and more about the man who run’s Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (AOC) political career.  He is one Saikat Chakrabarti. Now that he’s openly taken on Nancy Pelosi, he will be more and more in the spotlight and his comments will be dissected by political commentators to try and understand the ideology that drives AOC’s political positions.

Chakrabarti is one of the loudest political voices in Washington with respect to climate change.  According to the Washington Post, Chakrabarti has commented that, “The interesting thing about the Green New Deal is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all… we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.” Say what!? Yes, notwithstanding what AOC says about everyone dying in ten years, climate change’s focus isn’t the environment, it’s about implementing socialism. More about where that idea came from later.

You need to understand that the Green New Deal is a strategy to win elections. As reported by the Washington Post, Chakrabarti explained that strategy thusly: “The whole theory of change for the current Democratic Party is that to win this country we need to tack to the hypothetical middle. What I think that means is, you don’t take unnecessary risks, which translates to: You don’t really do anything. Whereas we’ve got a completely different theory of change, which is: You do the biggest, most badass thing you possibly can — and that’s going to excite people, and then they’re going to go vote.” There you have it straight from the horse’s mouth. Tell people something different, something exciting in order to get them to come out and vote for you. It doesn’t matter if it isn’t true. Political offices are treated as a commodity and the Green New Deal is the marketing strategy to sell that product.

Winning elections is only the first step, however. According to Tom Donohue, CEO the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Green New Deal is really about giving government unprecedented power over people’s lives (as reported by the Daily Wire). In a way, nothing would change.  That is, we would still be controlled by certain unelected elites who would remain faceless behind the Chakrabarti curtain. Socialism would simply be the Trojan Horse.

The infighting in the Democratic Party seems to be escalating, however, since the far left is not “tacking to the middle.” Instead, they are polarizing the party.  Recently, Chakrabarti has decided to target moderate Democrats, particularly those from the Congressional Black Caucus, in the 2020 congressional elections and replace them with people who are far left. Despite Chakrabarti targeting people of color, AOC has accused Nancy Pelosi of being a racist and Chakrabarti tweeted that the moderate Democrats should be renamed The New Southern Democrats. “They certainly seem hell bent to do to black and brown people today what the old Southern Democrats did [during] the 40s.” Funny, but it’s kind of hard calling someone a racist when you are one yourself.

The racially-charged rift in Congress does drop the curtain, though, if ever so slightly. Gregory Meeks, chairman of the Black Caucus, has fired back that Chakrabarti’s group is funded by liberal white elites. Strange how you’ve never heard this before. The media only gives us AOC this and AOC that. There are memes about this former bartender who has been in office for only a little over six months and who knows little to nothing about how government should be run. However, they never tell us about the real powers that be, about the man(elites) behind the curtain…and you probably thought that you were living in a democracy.

 

Epilogue

“The United Nations heads up the world-wide effort to promote global warming through the U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change. As reported by Zero Hedge, Christiana Figueres, the then head of that U.N. global warming agency, said that the U.N. goal was not that of environmental activists to save the world from ecological calamity… but rather to destroy capitalism.” – The Ethical Warrior.wordpress.com, The Politics of Global Warming.  Figueres went on to say that, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.” That’s the game plan.  Take out capitalism and replace it with socialism…and scare the hell out of everybody by saying that it’s the end of the world unless we change. It’s a dirty little secret that you weren’t supposed to know about…but, of course, now you know.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In a political discourse, things are said, sometimes awful things even.  However, there is a fine line that should never be crossed.  Ilhan Omar has boldly stepped where no one has dared to go before.  If we don’t call her out for it, she will be emboldened to repeat it, potentially causing grave harm and division to the country.  In fact, it may already have just happened.  Let me explain why.

Ilhan’s background is that she’s a Muslim.  She hates Jews and Christians. Her anti-Semitic comments while in Congress (and even before) have become almost legendary…and she has been virtually unchallenged in order to keep her from making exactly those kinds of remarks publicly. Because she’s a Muslim, she believes in Sharia Law.  Accordingly, she does not support the U.S. Constitution. She’s from Somalia and not unsurprisingly she is anti-American.  After all, she believes that 9/11 was an event where “some people did something.”

Many people are racist.  However, when an elected representative of our government does it in public it has totally different implications.  There’s a reason why important people make racist comments in public; either because they are racist themselves or because they are trying to create a race war (or both). She even blames Trump for the recent synagogue shootings because, as she said, both shooters had explicitly expressed their opposition to Trump.

Ilhan actually has it backwards.  When is it okay to voice your displeasure with a sitting president by killing people? If it was okay, we would have close to half the voting public killing people after every election, no matter who won or lost. So, this kind of twisted logic has no place in public discourse of government officials. However, Ilhan doesn’t see it that way. She says whatever she thinks no matter how politically incorrect or slanderous it may be. That’s why she is such a dangerous person.  For example, just the other day, Ilhan addressing a group of black women said that, “This is not going to be the country of white people.” This type of race war rhetoric will continue until someone finally makes a stand.  Racism against white people is not an acceptable form of racism (there are no acceptable forms of racism), except to people like Ilhan Omar.

Omar is a revolutionary.  This is how revolutionaries act and talk.  They will only accept their own ideology and everyone else is racist, anti-Semitic and Islamaphobic. They don’t want to work within the system but would rather blow the whole damn thing up.  Their inflammatory rhetoric is designed to get others to act out on their own fears and prejudices.  That’s what really happened in the synagogue shootings.  The people who are to blame for the environment that leads to these kinds of mass shootings, is people like Ilhan Omar. Her blaming Trump is only a diversionary tactic so that people don’t blame her.

Free speech is only free when everyone is free to speak their mind regardless of what they believe in…except when it harms others (e.g. libel and slander). Ilhan Omar has crossed that line. History has shown that revolutionaries  either overthrow their own form of government or they die trying…and typically a lot of other people wind up dying right along with them. That’s what happens when you cross the line.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s interesting the different ways that different people have reacted to the continuing drama that is Rep. Ilhan Omar.  The latest is David Duke, the former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, an acknowledged racist and an anti-Semite. Duke publicly defended Rep. Ilhan calling her the “most important member of the US Congress.” So, now we have one racist defending another racist. Well, two because Louis Farrakhan supports her too.  For that matter, the racist Congressional Black Caucus group is defending her as well.

However, let’s be brutally honest.  All people discriminate and a majority of people are racist.  All races discriminate against other racial groups.  So, the majority of them are racist too.  Politicians?  Of course, they are racist, Republicans and Democrats alike.

While it’s not surprising that racism has reared its ugly head in Congress, it is surprising to see the way the Democratic Party has handled it.  Columnist Joel Pollak put it this way, “Five months after an antisemitic gunman murdered eleven Jews at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, the worst attack on Jews in American history, the Democratic Party is struggling to condemn antisemitism…Democrats cannot bring themselves to offer a simple, straightforward condemnation of the hatred of Jews. Nor can they find the political courage to punish Omar, who has repeatedly used antisemitic rhetoric even after objections from party leaders and intervention by her own constituents.”  Rep.Ted Deutch, a Florida Democrat, echoed those sentiments as he criticized his party’s leaders for their failure to  condemn Omar, “Why are we unable to singularly condemn anti-Semitism?” Yeah, tell everyone why.

So, do they deny that members of their Party are racist? In a word, no. Instead of condemning anti-Semitism, the Democratic Party would rather point fingers at the racism of others as a defense.  Of course, we understand that the people they are referring to may well be racist too. However, it doesn’t matter.  When you tolerate racism, that makes you a racist. The Democratic Party has spoken loud and clear with their House resolution on bigotry, especially with what it failed to mention. I can only imagine what the world-wide ramifications will be with respect to anti-Semitism now.  If we can’t defend minorities in this country, what might happen to them elsewhere?

 

Epilogue

The Middle Eastern Women’s Coalition, a distinguished group of American women from Middle Eastern descent, recently called for the resignation of Rep. Omar. So, apparently not every Middle Eastern Woman is an anti-Semite.  In fact, far from it.  Apparently, it’s only those in Congress.

 

“Racism does not have a good track record. It’s been tried out for a long time and you’d think by now we’d want to put an end to it instead of putting it under new management.”  – Thomas Sowell

The Democrats would love everyone to believe that they stand for social justice, but their actions belie their platitudes.  You just can’t say one thing and do another.  That’s the definition of political suicide.  Here’s the problem.

Rep. Ilhan Omar suffers from a serious political disease.  It’s called foot-in-mouth disease. She doesn’t even seem to understand the seriousness of her public comments. That’s because she is who she is – a racist pure and simple.  The question is what, if anything, are the Democrats going to do about her.

If Omar is allowed to keep her seat in Congress, it will signal to the world that the Democratic Party tolerates, and maybe even supports, racism. Motions of censure are pathetic, at best. If you are going to be the champion of minority groups, you have to be true to your beliefs. It’s sort of like #MeToo. It has to be applied equally to everyone and I do mean everyone.  Otherwise, people will see the situation for what it is – pandering for votes.

And yet…Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders publicly support Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Omar are best friends (politically speaking). So, who speaks for the average American regarding anti-Semitism? Who speaks for the Jewish people? Apparently, not the Democratic Party. Not anymore at least.

However, the racism issue doesn’t stop there for Democrats. Jussie Smollett has all but disappeared from the headlines, but the stain remains.  Democrats came out immediately and supported his claims before any facts were even available, and then backed away when the truth became known. However, they never publicly renounced him.  That’s the problem. So, the world sees the actions of the Democratic Party for what it is – tacit support for racism.

The Democratic Party is bleeding voter loyalty everywhere.  Hispanics are leaving because the Party supports unlimited immigration, costing them employment opportunities.  Blacks (Blexit) are leaving for a multitude of reasons.  Many blacks feel ripped off by Obama because he never really supported the black community (e.g. jobs, crime). They also oppose immigration for the same reason that Hispanics do.  Then, there is prison reform which the blacks say is needed because of legislation which discriminated against them, legislation which was the brainchild of then President Bill Clinton back in 1994.

So, while espousing their ideals for social justice and the improvement of the lives of disadvantaged people everywhere, the Democrats have proven that they don’t always live up to those ideals, not for Hispanics, not for blacks and certainly not for Jews. So, good luck writing the party’s 2020 presidential platform.  Who’s going to believe them?

 

Epilogue

So, the other day, AOC accused CPAC of Islamophobia.  Well, the context of her remarks was the deadly 2015 shooting in California carried out by Muslim terrorists. So, if being afraid of Muslim terrorists makes one a Islamophobe, then I suspect that we may have a country full of Islamophobes.  In a time of political turmoil, AOC chose to support Muslims, in general, and her colleague Omar, who is a Muslim, in particular instead of directly addressing the anti-Semitic remarks of Omar. Therefore, how long can she pretend that she, herself, isn’t a racist too?

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Horowitz recently penned an article entitled “White Priviledge Is A Racist Idea. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/24/david-horowitz-white-privilege-is-a-racist-idea/  It’s well worth the read regardless of your belief system. Horowitz mentioned that the concept of white privilege is part of a totalitarian ideology but he didn’t exactly say what that means.  So, I’d like to take it one step further and expand on that idea.

The concept of white privilege is put out by other white people to marginalize white people.  That is a racist idea, no doubt.  But the concept has spread and can be found in almost every aspect of our society.  For example,on a telephone interview, CNN news reporter Areva Martin accused Sirius XM radio host David Webb of benefiting from his “white privilege” – even though, as she was to find out, Webb is black. She assumed that he was white and that by virtue of him being a white male, he had white privilege.

However, white privilege is part of a broader all-encompassing idea to eradicate the white race altogether, as a number of people have called for the eradication of the white race in the media.  That’s a first as far as I know.  Members of a race calling for its own extermination.  Oddly enough, those calling for the eradication of their own race aren’t exactly being good role models and sacrificing themselves for the cause, now are they?   Here’s why.

The totalitarian ideology Horowitz was referring to is this.  The world is to be “browned” and then ruled over by a small, white elite. The very same white elites who are calling for the eradication of their own white race!  Here’s the background.

The history of the white race is rather interesting.  They spread westward into Europe in ancient times and easily became the ruling class beginning with the Roman emperors. They were responsible for the advancements in Western Civilization and have dominated the world for at least the last 500 years.  But a funny thing happened on the way to the forum.  Their own race started to rebel.  First, there was the American War of Independence in 1776, followed by the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution.  They had met the enemy and it was themselves.

Kings fell by the wayside as a result of the revolutions, but they didn’t disappear.  Rather, they retreated into the shadows and helped to create shadow governments. These shadow governments have been responsible for almost all major changes in the world over the last 120 years and they have been responsible for all world wars.  Is it any wonder then that nearly all American presidents are related to one another, even Barack Obama.  They are all part of the bloodline that continues to rule over Western Civilization.

So, white privilege is synonymous with the eradication of all those who might compete for the throne, just like in ancient times when sons killed fathers and brothers killed brothers in their quest of power. Globalization is a buzzword for the concentration of power in the hands of a few (white elites).  Open borders is a buzzword for the browning of the world and the destruction of white societies.  Global warming is a buzzword for world domination through carbon taxes on CO2 which is necessary for all life on the planet.  The United Nations is a buzzword for a one-world government.

So, yes a totalitarian ideology.  Thank you David Horowitz.

 

Epilogue

I was watching TV sports talk the other day.  Watched several shows which had predominately black TV hosts (and always one woman). It struck me rather odd in an era of white privilege that we could have what is obviously black privilege in certain parts of society. Morgan Freeman was asked about this topic in an interview with CNN host Don Lemon. Don Lemon, who is black, asked Morgan Freeman, who is also black, if he thought that race plays a part in wealth distribution. Morgan Freeman said no, that you and I are proof.  Thank you Morgan Freeman.

At least there are two sane people in the world.

 

“…and went on to work for Fox News — where I’m told apparently blacks aren’t supposed to work. But yet, you come with [an] assumption and you go to white privilege. That’s actually insulting.” – David Webb, Fox News contributor

In a world full of racism, a curious thing is happening. One particular race is calling for the extinction of its own race. How can that be?

The race in question is the “white race.” Of course, there is no such thing as a white race, only white people. By that, I mean that white people belong to the Caucasian race, as do Jews, Arabs and many Hispanics. However, I digress.

Everything today is seen through the narrow, dimly-lit prism of race. The thing is – all races discriminate. All. In a recent study in England for example, one-third of the “white” population said that even they had been discriminated against. Further, the Japanese, who are generally wonderful people, discriminate against anyone who is not Japanese. They have a word for all foreigners, gaijin. It’s a derogatory term the way that it is often used. I should know as I lived there for a couple of years.

So, why are white people calling for the extermination of their own race. It’s simple, really. These people are the “elites” who want to rule the world and other white people are a threat to their power. This conflict between white people has been going on since the time of Cain and Abel (which I’ve written about previously). Fake race wars like we have today have very little to do with social justice. It’s simply a means to a political end, a tool to divide and conquer.

However, if some people have their way, the white race might some day disappear altogether.  In that case, I can just see the last white boy standing complaining about racism and the lack of social justice. It would be only fitting.

 

“Until the great mass of the people shall be filled with the sense of responsibility for each other’s welfare, social justice can never be attained.”  – Helen Keller