The Coup Is On

11/20/2019

America is traveling down a dangerous path, a path that eventually may lead to the end of the Republic.

A recent article in Politico written by Thomas Pepinsky, a professor of government at Cornell University and a nonresident senior fellow in the Foreign Policy Program at the Brookings Institution, summed it up quite nicely.  Pepinsky said that the impeachment hearings are really all about a disagreement in something as basic as our form of constitutional democracy where “a growing number of citizens and officials believe that norms, institutions and laws may be ignored, subverted or replaced.”  In plain language, it’s called a coup. Back in 2017, whistleblower’ attorney Mark Zaid was perhaps the first to publicly use the word tweeting, “The coup has started.”  This was long before the whistleblower complaint or the impeachment hearings, which perhaps tells you something about Zaid’s role in all of this.

The government officials that Pepinsky was referring to who believe that they can usurp the powers of the office of the President is generally called the Deep State.  It is a shadow government within the government.  The premise that the Deep State works under is that their expertise and authority cannot be questioned, not even by the President of the United States.  JFK tried, but failed.

Back in 2017, Mark Zaid also tweeted this out: “It’s very scary. We will get rid of him (Trump), and this country is strong enough to survive even him and his supporters. We have to.” Actually, you don’t “have to.” We have a constitutional form of government whereby elections determine who will be president. Unfortunately, when certain people feel that they can’t win at the ballot box, they may try to subvert the government, often by any means necessary.

Even former CIA Director John McLaughlin has openly talked about the Deep State/Trump war that rages beneath the surface of partisan Beltway politics.  He publicly applauded the Deep State for its role in the Trump impeachment saying, ” Thank God for the Deep State.”  The coup is on.

Of course, politicians and onions both stink, that’s a given. Then too, politicos have agendas; all sorts of agenda.  There’s the agenda, the agenda behind the agenda…and then the real agenda.  When you peel back the layers of the onion, you keep getting different versions.  Today’s news headlines tell the story:

Headline: “Shut It all Down” – Nancy Pelosi On What Will Happen If Impeachment Is Not Successful

Comment: Not much different, then, as compared to before the impeachment hearings.  In that case, maybe we should just shut down Congress.  Who needs them anyway?

Headline: Ocasio-Cortez On Impeachment – “About Preventing A Potentially Disastrous Outcome From Occurring Next Year”

Comment: AOC gets high marks for transparency. However, I feel that she may be creating the very outcome that she is trying to avoid.

Headline: Bill Maher Blasts Rachel Maddow’s Hypocrisy Over Biden and Ukraine

Comment: Now we know that the real impeachable offense linked to the Ukraine has to do with Biden (and the Deep State).

Headline: Whistleblower’ Attorney Mark Zaid Tweeted “The Coup Has Started”

Comment: Back in 2017, Zaid tweeted that “the coup has started… impeachment will follow ultimately.”  Back then, very few knew what he was talking about. Now it’s quite obvious to everyone.  Of course, how did Zaid know this before it happened unless….

“Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it.” – Mark Twain

Journalist Chris Hedges was interviewed recently on The Hill’s “Rising” program. Here’s what he had to say: 

“The impeachment (of Trump) is driven by the Deep State and the Deep State is real; those are the bankers, the corporatists and the lobbyists and the intelligence chiefs.  We see them now very publicly attacking Trump, the technocrats, the generals, because Trump has been such a disaster in terms of the management of Empire…and the Empire’s endless wars…What we’ve seen, which is quite remarkable when you put it in historical context, is a very public war between the Deep State and Trump and that began the moment he was elected.”

Hedges says that the politics of the Deep State is driven by Trump’s opposition to “endless wars.”  They oppose him for the same reasons that they have attacked Tulsi Gabbard (courtesy of Hillary Clinton). Gabbard, a Democratic candidate for president, has made her opposition to endless wars the centerpiece of her political campaign. Although Gabbard’s polling numbers are very low, the Deep State fears her because her presence at the Democratic debates could result in a very public discussion about such endless wars, a discussion that they’ve tried desperately to sweep under the rug (what I refer to as The Tulsi Gabbard Effect).

That is why you will see any number of governmental technocrats, like the National Security Council staffers who have testified at the impeachment hearings, say that they disagree with Trump’s foreign policy.  Of course they do since, as Chris Hedges noted, they are all members of the Deep State.  The so-called Civil War is real.  That’s why the outcry from both sides of the congressional aisle was so loud when Trump announced the so-called troop withdrawal from Syria.

Politics in this country for the last seventy years or so has been driven by the Deep State. It was none other than former president Dwight Eisenhower who first warned us about what he called the military-industrial complex (the Deep State). Today, there a few people who are brave enough to oppose the Deep State’s endless wars.  John McLaughlin isn’t one of them.

 

Thank God for the Deep State.”  – John McLaughlin, former CIA director

Former President Obama is back in the news. In a speech to wealthy liberal donors, he said that the Democratic Party should ease off talk of revolution.  

Now Barack is a very astute politician and he can see the handwriting on the wall that others might miss. So, he says “ease off.” Don’t stop you understand, just ease off. What’s the difference you’re probably asking. Here’s the difference.

Obama warned that political activists have been pushing the envelope too far left and have lost touch with voters. This coming from the man who championed the platform to “radically transform America.”  However, there’s logic to the illogic of what Obama said.  He knows that the Democrats probably can’t win the 2020 election as things currently stand.  That is, impeachment is turning into a fiasco and the Democratic candidates at the top of the polls are espousing ideas that were, until recently, considered untenable even within the Democratic Party. Although he didn’t mention anyone by name, he really didn’t need to.  Everybody knows that he was referring to the ideology of Warren and Sanders and to the Squad’s Rashida Tliab’s statement that we need a political revolution to completely transform America (again, Obama’s own one-time rallying cry).

Barack knows this: the average American voter doesn’t want to tear down the whole system.  As he said, “They just don’t want to see crazy stuff.” So, he stressed to his audience that Democratic candidates should be striving to win elections.  Thus, the rift in the Democratic Party that Obama was alluding to. That is, the new socialists have dominated headlines and pushed the Democratic Party too far left. As a result, they are at odds with the moderates within the Party. Why? Well, because the far-left ideology doesn’t play in Peoria (with independent and swing voters).

Nothing has really changed. Obama still wants to radically transform America, but he’s smart enough to realize that you first need to win elections. He has no problem with the message of Warren and Sanders, only the way that they alienate certain voters. Joy Behar clearly understood that when she told her audience on The View that the Dems shouldn’t tell voters ahead of time before seizing their guns. 

At the end of the day, Obama will support Warren or Sanders if they win his party’s nomination. However, he would prefer a moderate who would have a better chance of winning in 2020. For Obama, it’s win first and then radically transform. I guess he forgot to tell Hillary. 

Epilogue

The art of being a politician is to lie to the voters at election time and tell them what they want to hear. Upon being elected, they then do whatever they want (which is rarely, if ever, what their constituents want) and then come the next election they will try to convince you of all the great things that they did for you. As Mark Twain succinctly put it, “Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason.”

 

When I was growing up, the urban myth was that man evolved from monkeys.  However, if that was so, how come there are still monkeys?  That is, why didn’t all monkeys evolve into humans? 

However, science research into man’s origins has come a long way since then. For example, most people have Rh positive blood which shares a common gene with the rhesus monkey. In fact, man’s DNA and the DNA of the rhesus monkey are 93% similar; that’s 93% as compared to, say, the Abyssinian house cat whose genes are 90% similar to humans. Even a lowly sea urchin comes in at 70%. However some humans, although very few Asians or Africans, (and no monkeys), have Rh negative blood.  The real conundrum is that Rh negative blood has no predecessor anywhere on the planet, which is why I refer to it as the blood of the gods. 

According to a recent study by molecular biologists Alan Wilson and Rebecca Cann, who originally popularized the Out Of Africa evolutionary theory, man’s DNA can be traced back 400,000 years…to Australia and the aboriginals there. That’s Australia… and not Africa.  Problem is that Australia does not have monkeys and never has had either.  Further, DNA results from these ancient aboriginals as well as China and another location in Asia show that man mixed genetically with unknown species. Somewhat similarly, geneticists say that some of man’s DNA has an extraterrestrial origin.

So, what does this all add up to? Did life really begin in Australia? Despite all the advances in genetics research, a lot of uncertainties still exist.  There is one thing that I am certain of, though.  That is, “the powers that be” will continue to hide the truth of man’s origins from the masses.  It’s a dirty little secret that you’re not supposed to know about… but, of course, now you know (well, sort of).

 

“What has happened is that genetics has become a branch of information technology. It is pure information. It’s digital information. It’s precisely the kind of information that can be translated digit for digit, byte for byte, into any other kind of information and translated back again. This is a major revolution. I suppose it’s probably ‘the’ major revolution in the whole history of our understanding of ourselves.”  – Richard Dawkins                                               

The $64,000 question is this: Exactly what would socialism look like in this country if it were implemented?  Today’s news headlines tell the story.

1. Healthcare for all, including illegals

Headline – Elizabeth Warren Confirms Her Medicare For All Plan Will Cover Illegals

Headline – Moody’s Economist Who Backed Warren “Medicare For All Plan” Now Doubts She Can Pay For It

Headline – Fact Check: Elizabeth Warren’s Medicare For All Plan Raises Taxes On Middle Class

Comment:  That’s because taxing the rich is not quite all it’s cracked up to be as an article in The Hill pointed out, “The philosophy of envy and siphoning from the rich appeals to a large segment of the population that does not realize that the definition of ‘rich’ is a spiral of devolution that eventually will reach every business and every individual who works for a living.” 

 

2. No free speech. 

Joy Behar during a recent interview of Donald Trump Jr. on The View got tired of the audience applauding for Trump and yelled at her audience, “This isn’t a MAGA rally.”

Comment: This is how you silence any detractors.

 

3. Open borders 

Headline: Pelosi-Schiff Democrats Block All Funding For U S Border Wall – Pass Funding For Border Security In Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon and Assad’s Syria

Comment:  Democratic presidential contender Tulsi Gabbrd got it right when she said, “We Do Not Have a Nation If We Have No Borders.”

 

4. No Second Amendment

Headline – Joy Behar To Dems: Don’t Tell Voters Ahead of Time Before Seizing Their Guns

 

5. No freedom of the press and no free elections

Headline – ABC News Shelved Story On Bill Clinton and Epstein Three Years Ago During 2016 Election To Help Hillary Clinton

 

6. No economic prosperity

Headline – Liz Warren Is Now Pushing a Plan That Will Eliminate Two Million American Jobs

Comment: Goodbye America, hello Venezuela.

 

7. Illegals would have more rights than citizens

Headline – Bernie Sanders Promises Immediate Legal Status and Free Healthcare and College To Illegals

 

8. No Constitution, no religious freedom.

Headline – Democrat Mouthpiece and Squad Leader Rashida Tlaib: We Need A Political Revolution to Completely Transform America

Comment: When she says a revolution is needed to completely transform America, she means it.  Sharia Law will surely follow.

 

Epilogue

“As Waleed Shahid, a former aide to AOC, put it,  ‘You run an insurgent anti-establishment campaign to get into office to become the establishment.’  So, the objective is to become the establishment, displacing everything and everyone in the process. Here’s the strategy: attack the status quo, create division, appeal to the have-nots and use wealth transfers as a way to create ‘social justice.’ You create the problem, then you propose the solution…and, then, you take over, or as Waleed Shahid said you become the establishment.  It’s right out of the playbook of Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals.”  The Ethical Warrior, A Primer On The Green New Deal

 

“But this is the f—ing American Dream she is s—ing on.” – Leon Cooperman, referring to Elizabeth Warren

One of the big lies about global warming is what is not being said. That is, we are currently in what is a historically cold period. Once you know this, you will understand that global warming is not a problem; it is actually necessary to sustain life on the planet. Temperatures need to go up as we are just coming out of a mini ice age. 

Not only are temperatures historically low, but CO2 levels are also historically low.  Historically, in warmer periods (with high CO2), the planet has actually had its most prosperous epochs.  For example, the Cambrian Explosion was responsible for the creation for much of the diversity in animal life on the planet. Here’s the kicker: Temperatures and CO2 levels were much higher then. Much higher.

The reason is that as temperatures and CO2 go up, the earth actually becomes greener and more conducive to life whereas when it gets colder, life on the planet can wither and die. That’s what you need to know.  Everything else is a major psyops.

For those of you who may be disappointed that the U.S. is withdrawing from the Paris Climate Accords, you should know this.  The climate accords are not about environmental disaster, rather it is about economics and who controls the power to rule the planet. Remember, money rules the world.  As Christiana Figueres, the then head of the United Nations efforts to promote the Paris Climate Accords, admitted, the true objective of the climate accords is to destroy capitalism.

You probably don’t know this, but the two biggest polluters in the world (China and India) are basically exempt from the Paris Climate Accords in that they do not have to reduce carbon emissions (in fact, they are allowed to increase emissions). So, this whole thing is a smokescreen designed to adversely affect the economic systems of Western Civilization while boosting those of China and India. 

You may or may not agree with me on these points, but consider this. Did you expect the politicians to actually tell you the truth? Their approval rating falls off the map and yet some still defend their grand schemes. It proves that life hasn’t changed much in 500 years; that is, there are kings (the elites) and peasants, and of course we are the peasants. They keep getting richer while we keep getting poorer. The one true equalizer is death.  However, I seriously doubt that anyone (rich or poor) will die in our lifetime from global warming.

Every day it seems the far-left keeps digging their political grave a little deeper.  Today’s headlines tell the story:

Headline – Fact Check: Warren’s Medicare For All Plan Raises Taxes On Middle Class

Comment – Was there ever a doubt? Almost by definition, the Middle Class pays for everything and she thought that she could get people to believe otherwise.

Headline – Liz Warren Now Pushing A Plan That Will Eliminate Two Million Jobs

Comment – So, exactly who is going to be paying the taxes for welfare/unemployment on those two million people who will be out of work?

Headline – Omar Comes Under Scrutiny For Her “Present” Vote On Armenian Genocide

Comment – Omar’s problems just keep compounding. In this case, it’s because she’s taking money from Turkey. It doesn’t help that Omar is a Muslim and Turkey is a Muslim country.

Headline – Bernie Sanders Claims That His Ideas Are Not Far Left

Comment – Say what! They don’t make them any further left than Bernie. Besides once a communist, always a communist.

 

Humor of the day

Headline – “Saturday Night Live” Mocks Elizabeth Warren’s $52 Trillion Medicare For All Plan

Comment – Except, $52 trillion is no laughing matter.

All roads lead to Basel, Switzerland and the shadowy world of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS).  BIS is, by any standard, the center of the world’s banking system. BIS is an unelected and unaccountable central bank with complete immunity from taxation and national laws.  Ever wonder why Switzerland has never been invaded, even by Hitler?  Now you know.

Money runs the world, especially as it’s used to corrupt governments and fund terrorist groups. As the saying goes, “Just follow the money trail.”  Of course, it’s not even real money, but rather fiat currency. What a scam. If you need more money, you just print it.

Wars are created by the global elite to overthrow governments (regime change) and steal natural resources. The wars are financed by the world banking system and regardless of who wins, one side is destroyed and the other is virtually bankrupt. One such outcome was the Civil War. Drug running and human trafficking are also directly connected to the power structure. Afghanistan and Syria, for example, are as much about drugs and human trafficking as they are about geopolitics.

However, globalism is on the defensive around the world. People are waking up and voting for populistic governments. Further, the elite’s Western financial system is in a state of near-collapse. Many banks and governments are insolvent, although it is unlikely that you will ever hear about this.  Open public revolt/riots are occurring throughout the world. We are literally on the precipice staring down into the abyss.  However, the media won’t report on what’s really going on. It’s a dirty little secret that you’re not supposed to know about…but, of course, now you know.

The Second Civil War is currently being waged in the House of Representatives (the Trump impeachment inquiry) and in the Department of Justice where AG Barr is running a criminal investigation of Deep State activities, including the Russia collusion hoax.  However, perhaps the real battle is taking place in the Supreme Court in the case of Seila Law LLC vs. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The question before the Supreme Court is whether a government agency has the authority to act independent of the Executive Branch (i.e. the President of the United States).  The bottom line is this: Does the President have the right to hire and fire workers in the Executive Branch?

Our government has three distinct branches of government whose powers and authority are not supposed to overlap.  The three branches of government create an environment where there is a “separation of powers.” Congress writes laws, the President runs the country and enforces the laws and the courts decide if the laws and executive action are constitutional.  Pretty simple, right?

However, that has never stopped presidents from issuing executive orders. For example, Barack Obama issued 277 executive orders including one which allows the President to take over the media and another one which effectively allows the President to take over the whole country.  To that point, Kamala Harris has said that, “Upon being elected, I will give the United States Congress 100 days to get their act together and have the courage to pass reasonable gun safety laws and if they fail to do it, then I will take executive action….”

The three prongs of the Second Civil War cited above is all about this: Who has the authority to run the government? Is it the President or the unelected bureaucrats that work in the various government agencies of the Executive Branch (the Deep State)? That’s why former CIA director John McLaughlin responded to the Trump impeachment inquiry by saying: “Thank God for the Deep State.”

That’s the source of the conflict which resulted in the Russia-collusion hoax.

That’s the source of the conflict which resulted in the Trump impeachment inquiry.

This is the very conflict that got JFK assassinated.  That is, the President vs. the Deep State.

This is not about politics per se. This not about Democrats vs. Republicans.  This is about who runs our country and has the power to make public policy…and, specifically, this is about whether or not the nation will continue to be embroiled in “endless wars” abroad. Tulsi Gabbard, a Democratic contender for president, has come out against endless wars saying, “That is why the neocon/neolib warmongers will do anything to stop me.”  She specifically calls out both sides of the political spectrum.

And you probably thought, perhaps, that all of this was just some personal vendetta between Donald Trump and Nancy Pelosi.