The Spy Game



John LeCarre would have proud. The truth is sometimes so unbelievable that even LeCarre, himself, couldn’t make it up.

As reported in an article in ZeroHedge, a British academic is suing an FBI informant who claims tried to embroil them in a plot to topple the President of the United States of America.  Of course, this relates to the now collapsed Russia collusion narrative.  The British love their James Bond stories and fancy themselves as world-class spies. However, this little spy game apparently has come unraveled with the filing of a lawsuit and the soon-to-be public airing of one of the matters investigated by Robert Mueller.

The cast of characters in this lawsuit closely mirrors what I have written about previously.  It includes the following people:

  • Stefan Halper, defendant, who is a known FBI informant with ties to American and British Intelligence.
  • Sir Richard Dearlove, former head of British Intelligence MI6.
  • Rogue agents at the FBI.
  • Political operatives at Cambridge University (in England).

This lawsuit reinforces the notion that the British played a key role in developing the Russia collusion narrative and that the Russians were used as patsies, just as General Flynn and George Papadopoulos were.  Now that the government files on this matter are going to be declassified, some parts of this story are about to be revealed for all to see.

I’d love to be a fly on the wall when Trump meets with Prime Minister May. Good thing (for her) that she has already said that she is going to step down. How much will the American/British relationship be affected by all of this? The fallout could be quite interesting, or as the Brits say “jolly good.”



In my last post, I good naturally said that the Queen did it (was primarily responsible for starting the Russia collusion narrative).  Actually, I was only half joking. The name to look for in this whole sordid mess is Arvinder Sambei, formerly  a senior British crown prosecutor.  In other words, special counsel to the Queen. Sambei has connections to all the players in this matter and also has extensive links with Robert Mueller (of all people). Where is John LeCarre when you need him?

The Queen Did It



If you have ever played the game of Clue, you know that the point of the game is to find out who did it. With respect to the Russia collusion narrative, Attorney General Barr is investigating how that ever got started.  He’ll supposedly tell us who did it.

Not to steal anyone’s thunder, but I’m going to suggest that the Queen did it.  By that I mean, the British government, the City of London Corporation or whatever you might choose to call them. In previous posts, I’ve identified a litany of British intelligence operatives and politicians who I believe were involved in developing the Russia collusion narrative (along with their counterparts in this country).  Articles in the Telegraph and the Daily Mail, UK newspapers, have both reported that British Intelligence knew about the dossier early in the game.  Of course, that revelation is a smokescreen to prevent people from actually discovering that British Intelligence actually produced the Steele dossier itself.

A leaked internal document from the House of Lords called the Integrity Initiative report revealed the British role in Spygate.  Christopher Steele who put the Russia collusion dossier together was supposedly ex-British Intelligence but I’m here to tell you that there is no such thing as “ex” in intelligence circles.  By the way, Steele, himself, has backed away from his own work in court testimony and now describes it as “unverified raw intelligence.”  In other words, garbage. According to the New York Times, Steele has also admitted publicly that he may have been fed disinformation.  That’s intelligence-speak for saying that he produced the disinformation himself.

You need to understand that the history of British involvement in American politics goes back to the American Revolution.  The Revolution was originally a fight by the colonists to free themselves from the clutches of the then world elite, the successors to the East India Company. However, the American Revolution never really ended. That war continues to this day and is associated with many groups, the neocons, the 1% and the Deep State, to name just a few.

As for the Clue game, you should now know that the Queen did it, in the Parliament with the Steele dossier report.



#SpyGate was a transatlantic plot to stop Trump. The British Deep State feared Trump like they feared Brexit. They were part of the same movement, and both posed a threat to the political ruling class on both sides of the pond.”  – Paul Sperry, author and political commentator


The Barr Effect



In politics, it’s usually what you’re never going to hear about that’s truly important. Governments have an incentive to not tell the public the whole truth.  However, sometimes you will hear the truth because governments are currying favor with one another. So, too, an event might provide a psychological reason for governments to disclose the truth when they would otherwise would not.  Such an event was the naming of Bill Barr as Attorney General.

When the dirty laundry is inevitably going to be aired publicly, governments and government officials try to get out in front of the disclosure.  With Bill Barr publicly saying that he is going to investigate the origins of the Russian collusion narrative, it’s become a mad scramble for people to come clean or to try and throw someone else under the proverbial bus. Here’s a few examples:

  • Both James Comey and John Brennan are accusing each other of being the major culprit in having the Obama Administration embrace the phony Steele Dossier which eventually resulted in Robert Mueller being named Special Prosecutor of a Russia collusion investigation. Keep in mind, though, that the Steele dossier was funded by the DNC and the Hillary Clinton election campaign and was the work product of the British government. Meanwhile, Jame Baker who was then the FBI’s top lawyer said that he didn’t believe that the Steele dossier was legit even back then. Comment: Just a bunch of rats deserting a sinking ship.
  • Both the Italian and Ukrainian governments have previously opened investigations into their governments’ role in the Steele dossier. Recently, the Italian Prime Minister fired six top officials of Italy’s various intel agencies because of their roles in the entrapment of former Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos (which immediately preceded and led to the Russia collusion investigation).

As Robert Mueller’s report states, there was no collusion with Russia. However, there appears to have been collusion with respect to Britain, Italy, the Ukraine and possibly Australia as well. Politics does make strange bedfellows so don’t count on ever hearing the real story. When you go down this rabbit hole, it leads to places you’d never expect.



Of course, then there’s the collusion between Joe Biden and China, Bill Clinton and Russia, Diane Feinstein and John Kerry with Iran. Seems like everybody is colluding with someone.



As many of you know, I have posted many articles on the weirdness of our universe.  Science has investigated this weirdness and what they have found defies description (see link for the video entitled, “Einstein’s Nightmare, The Secrets of Quantum Physics” –  Here’s a few of the findings from the video:

  • Everything that we regard as real is made up of things that cannot themselves be regarded as real.
  • Reality, itself, defies all common sense so that everything that we thought we knew might turn out to be completely wrong.
  • Science can never know where an electron (the basic building block of reality) is until they measure it because the electron, itself, is everywhere at once.
  • Einstein’s version of reality was not correct
  • What Einstein called “spooky action” exists, it’s just that we don’t know what it is. In the end, even Einstein had to admit to the weirdness of quantum physics.

However, the insurmountable challenge for science is to, in effect, reverse engineer reality. I say insurmountable because all they can observe and measure is the result, never the cause. That’s the very nature of quantum physics.  The source of reality lies beyond space and time where the rules are totally different than they are here.

The universe is the end result of something from another place and time, assuming that they even exist in any meaningful way that we could grasp. That is, the source is not only beyond space and time but it is infinitely beyond our ability to comprehend it.  The world, it turns out, is not physical but rather non-physical.  It is not rational but rather unpredictable.  In fact, the world cannot be predicted.  As they demonstrated in the video, the spinning coin only comes up heads or tails after we observe it.

It was physicist John Wheeler who famously stated, “The universe does not exist ‘out there,’ independent of us. We are inescapably involved in bringing about that which appears to be happening. We are not only observers. We are participators.” Now that’s spooky action for you.

And exactly what does that make us?





Where is the mind (the seat of consciousness)? Apparently, science can’t find it, at least not where most would expect it to be (inside the body). Here’s what is really happening.

To be sure, the mind is not in the body – scientific experiments confirm that.  At the risk of oversimplifying, you can think of the mind as being in a parallel world, with a link to this world. This would be not entirely unlike the scientist and the area of his laboratory where the experiments are conducted (in isolation).  The scientist (mind) resides outside the laboratory while the A.I. (a body with a brain) is inside the laboratory monitoring the experiment with its sensory equipment.

Of course, it shouldn’t be totally surprising that the mind is not in the body since we are not of the body.  We are electromagnetic energy and our electromagnetic energy field extends outside of the body.  The body is a container of sorts with the ability to broadcast and receive.  As such, it can be thought of as a conduit which constantly broadcasts and receives information (that is floating in the universe).

The body is loaded with sensory equipment but that sensory equipment cannot comprehend the high-tech reality that we call “our world.”  The movie The Matrix was a fairly accurate portrayal of the universe.  That is, it’s digital, it’s multi-dimensional….an engineered world of simulated reality using binary code.

Perception is reality it’s true, but reality is not perception. Our senses deceive us into believing that the world described by our physical senses is real. Quantum physics has proved, however, that matter is only a projection of energy.  The world is really energy, not matter.

With respect to the question of what are we doing here in the matrix, the native peoples knew far better than modern man.  Our technology only stifles our exploration of the world.  As the Australian aboriginals say, “We are all visitors to this time, this place.  We are just passing through.  Our purpose here is to observe, to learn, to grow, to love…and then we return home.”


The New Civil War



              “The goal of socialism is communism.” – Vladimir Lenin 

For Lenin, socialism was the political system which would be used as a tool to achieve total control (Communism).This ideology all began, of course, with Karl Marx.

Marx wrote that societies developed in stages, starting with a primitive society followed by feudalism and then capitalism. After capitalism, Marx said that the state would seize control of all means of production (socialism) and Marx believed that socialism would then inevitably lead to the final end goal of communism.  Communism would then usher in totalitarianism. This was Marx’s goal, his vision of utopia.

In order to bring about socialism, capitalism has to be destroyed first. Thus the workers are always led to believe that capitalism is the source of their problems.  Not much has changed, even in today’s world. Universities indoctrinate their students that capitalism is evil.  Never mind that the evils of capitalism, or any other system, are the elite who run the system and never mind that the elite are intentionally trying to destroy capitalism so that they can usher in socialism.

Note: If a student would study Economics in college, there would be no way that they could support socialism unless they have been brainwashed.

So, institutions become weaponized and capitalism is demonized as the great culprit of the wealth gap between rich and poor when, in fact, capitalism has been the engine that has driven global prosperity since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The gap between the rich and poor has been created by the 1% to undermine confidence in the current system, which has been turned into a bastardized version of capitalism (some call it crony capitalism, but it is really fascism).

Socialism goes by the name social democracy in Europe. It is failing and the eulogy has already been dropped off at the door.  It’s a failure because democracy and socialism cannot co-exist, as socialism requires that the state take control of all means of production.  This leads to a power struggle between control by the state and personal freedoms. One or the other has to die. Fortunately, people in Europe are finally waking up to the game and a wave of populism marks the death knell for the social democracy experiment.

Accordingly, America has now become the new frontier for pushing the socialist agenda.  That can be clearly seen by the radicalization of the Democratic Party and their new platform featuring the Green New Deal. This isn’t simply a change in economic philosophy, it’s a revolution. They intend to overthrow the existing paradigm. Both sides have begun to play their big cards.  On the left there is the threat of impeachment and contempt of Congress charges.  The weapons on the right include emergency orders and executive privilege, and in an extreme situation even martial law isn’t off the table.  Welcome to the new Civil War.


Required reading: “Only Capitalism Will Save The Millennials” – an article by Anthony P. Mueller, Mises Institute






In a recent article in the New York Times entitled “Joe Biden and the Party of Davos,” the Times gave their take on the upcoming 2020 presidential election and the chances of Joe Biden. The Times noted that, “Trump is … the face… of a revolution against the Party of Davos, the network of elites whose economic and cultural prescriptions came to be seen by myriad voters across the United States and Europe as camouflage for a self-serving heist….This revolution is not an American phenomenon. It is much wider. Its first clear-cut expression was not Trump’s victory but Britain’s Brexit vote…. It is political, economic and cultural, driven by a resurgence of those unhappy twins: fear and nationalism.”

What is happening in the U.S. is simply a reflection of the world-wide war between globalism and nationalism. This war has produced a chasm that has torn the country politically, a literal civil war.  The differences between the two factions are being played out on a playing field of economics, environmental matters and social issues, all under the guise of political correctness.

Yes, there are some ideological differences to be sure, but it’s mostly optics.  The overriding issue is control, and who gets to have it. That’s why nationalism/populism has become such a driving force in global politics.  It’s a clear rejection of the elite’s Party of Davos, and that’s why the Times says that Joe Biden’s campaign will inevitably have serious problems.  Of course, they forgot to mention the real dirt on Biden.  That is, the brewing Ukraine scandal or Biden’s  connections to the Russia-collusion narrative.  It’s funny how that was left out of the Mueller report.

Then there’s the whole #MeToo mess and the legacy of Al Franken.  When will the next woman come forward?  It’s inevitable, isn’t it? However, Biden apparently still has the support of the Party of Davos despite the fact that many on the left think that he is not electable because he is old, white and a man. However, this is simply a reflection of the fact that the far left has become so polarized that it basically now represents only the young, women and minorities.

Memories of past political failures do tend to be very short in Washington.  Have they already forgotten the debacles of George McGovern and Barry Goldwater? Don’t they realize that centrist presidential candidates are usually the only ones that are electable? In truth, that’s the only reason that Joe Biden may yet get the Democratic Party nomination.


There was more fallout yesterday from the ending of the fake Russia-collusion narrative. Gavin Williamson, the British Defense Secretary, was fired by Prime Minister May. She obviously was not happy with how the coup plot against Trump had boomeranged and how it was now threatening to embroil the British government.  So, Williamson got the axe.

The triggering event was Attorney General Barr’s testimony before the U.S. Senate.  During that testimony, Barr revealed that there are ongoing criminal investigations into some of the participants in the Russia-collusion narrative.  If you were to go down that rabbit hole, you would instantly know what an Alice In Wonderland place the U.S. government is and who these people actually answer to. Theresa May certainly knows and she’s afraid of what Barr will learn.

Here’s all that you really need to know. The Deep State is British but Britain is not the Deep State. By that I mean that the Deep State, as it is referred to, is American in its make-up but the ultimate power resides with the City of London Corporation (not to be confused with the city of London). They are the ultimate power brokers of the world.  They start the wars, and frequently finance both sides, and, of course, they usually wind up “owning” the winners.

Trump is not the first American president to run afoul of the City of London Corporation (JFK comes immediately to mind), nor will he be the last. As the saying goes, ”Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” So, what we’re saddled with is a government that is absolutely corrupted (with the Deep State).


In a political discourse, things are said, sometimes awful things even.  However, there is a fine line that should never be crossed.  Ilhan Omar has boldly stepped where no one has dared to go before.  If we don’t call her out for it, she will be emboldened to repeat it, potentially causing grave harm and division to the country.  In fact, it may already have just happened.  Let me explain why.

Ilhan’s background is that she’s a Muslim.  She hates Jews and Christians. Her anti-Semitic comments while in Congress (and even before) have become almost legendary…and she has been virtually unchallenged in order to keep her from making exactly those kinds of remarks publicly. Because she’s a Muslim, she believes in Sharia Law.  Accordingly, she does not support the U.S. Constitution. She’s from Somalia and not unsurprisingly she is anti-American.  After all, she believes that 9/11 was an event where “some people did something.”

Many people are racist.  However, when an elected representative of our government does it in public it has totally different implications.  There’s a reason why important people make racist comments in public; either because they are racist themselves or because they are trying to create a race war (or both). She even blames Trump for the recent synagogue shootings because, as she said, both shooters had explicitly expressed their opposition to Trump.

Ilhan actually has it backwards.  When is it okay to voice your displeasure with a sitting president by killing people? If it was okay, we would have close to half the voting public killing people after every election, no matter who won or lost. So, this kind of twisted logic has no place in public discourse of government officials. However, Ilhan doesn’t see it that way. She says whatever she thinks no matter how politically incorrect or slanderous it may be. That’s why she is such a dangerous person.  For example, just the other day, Ilhan addressing a group of black women said that, “This is not going to be the country of white people.” This type of race war rhetoric will continue until someone finally makes a stand.  Racism against white people is not an acceptable form of racism (there are no acceptable forms of racism), except to people like Ilhan Omar.

Omar is a revolutionary.  This is how revolutionaries act and talk.  They will only accept their own ideology and everyone else is racist, anti-Semitic and Islamaphobic. They don’t want to work within the system but would rather blow the whole damn thing up.  Their inflammatory rhetoric is designed to get others to act out on their own fears and prejudices.  That’s what really happened in the synagogue shootings.  The people who are to blame for the environment that leads to these kinds of mass shootings, is people like Ilhan Omar. Her blaming Trump is only a diversionary tactic so that people don’t blame her.

Free speech is only free when everyone is free to speak their mind regardless of what they believe in…except when it harms others (e.g. libel and slander). Ilhan Omar has crossed that line. History has shown that revolutionaries  either overthrow their own form of government or they die trying…and typically a lot of other people wind up dying right along with them. That’s what happens when you cross the line.